FYI: There is no such pathology as “resist-refuse dynamic” – that is the latest effort by forensic psychology to make up new pathology from thin-air.
It is an effort by the pathogen that lives in them to keep them in charge… because they don’t diagnose pathology. Instead, the pathogen motivates its minions to make up new forms of pathology to avoid diagnosing the Child Psychological Abuse – DSM-5 V995.51 – the shared (induced) delusional disorder.
If any of them try to introduce their new pathology – the “resist-refuse dynamic” as evidence in courts – Daubert and Kelly-Frye it. It doesn’t exist. They are just making stuff up – again.
If an attorney allows the “resist-refuse dynamic” into evidence without subjecting it to Daubert and Kelly-Frye challenge, they should be disbarred for incompetence as a lawyer.
There is no such pathology as a “resist-refuse dynamic” – it is a shared persecutory delusion, a thought disorder, and the DSM-5 diagnosis is V995.51 Child Psychological Abuse.
The pathogen seeks to hide. Don’t let it, expose it for what it is – a delusional thought disorder in the parent imposed on the child – a real thing – a DSM-5 diagnosis of V995.51 Child Psychological Abuse.
They have duty to protect obligations.
A secondary diagnosis warranting prominent diagnostic consideration is DSM-5 V995.82 Spouse or Partner Abuse, Psychological. This is spousal emotional and psychological abuse of one parent by the other using the child as the weapon.
They have duty to protect obligations – and they are failing. They are misdiagnosing the pathology – negligent misdiagnosis, i.e., failure to take proper care in their assessment. They are failing in their duty to protect the child from psychological child abuse, they are failing to protect the targeted parent from emotional and psychological spousal abuse.
And instead, they are participating in the child abuse and spousal abuse – if you believe the shared delusion, you become PART of the shared delusion, you become part of the pathology, When that pathology is child abuse, you become part of the child abuse.
The assessment of delusional thought disorder pathology is a Mental Status Exam of thought and perception (NCBI: Mental Status Exam).
Google negligence: Failure to take proper care in doing something. Law: failure to use reasonable care, resulting in damage or injury to another.
Did they conduct a proper risk assessment for possible child psychological abuse (DSM-5 V995.51 Child Psychological Abuse)? Did they conduct a proper risk assessment for possible spousal emotional and psychological abuse of one parent by the other using the child as the weapon (DSM-5 V995.82 Spouse or Partner Abuse, Psychological)?
Did they conduct a proper assessment for real things that really exist? Did they fail in their duty to protect the child from child abuse and the parent from spousal abuse? Did this result in damage or injury to the child and targeted parent?
When they make up new pathology that doesn’t exist, they are trying to avoid accountability for their negligent malpractice surrounding pathology that actually exists – child abuse (DSM-5 V995.51 Child Psychological Abuse) and spousal abuse (DSM-5 V995.82 Spouse or Partner Abuse, Psychological).
You have rights, but only if you stand and demand them. The forensic psychologists that surround you are ignorant, incompetent, negligent, and unethical – violations to Standards 2.04, 9.01, and 2.01 and failure in their duty to protect on two separate grounds, failure to protect the child and failure to protect the targeted parent.
If they did this to you, they did it to the last child and parent, and they will do it to the next child and parent… unless you stop them. You must fight for each other and each other’s children. A step forward by anyone is a step forward for everyone, for all children and all parents everywhere.
Words have meaning (Standards 2.04, 9.01, 2.01). They have obligations. You have rights – but only if you fight for them.
Craig Childress, Psy.D.
Clinical Psychologist, CA PSY 18857