Erasing Families : Holiday Message 😘🎄🥳

All of the volunteers at Erasing Family wish Everyone a Safe and blessed holiday! We encourage you to send a thoughtful note and invitation to your child; underneath their pain your children still love you. For children who have been erased, your parents love you. No matter how long it has been, it’s never too late to start fresh. We know how painful it is for kids to miss a parent and their family; and for parents to miss their children. It’s time to heal! Join us in shining light and solutions to awaken the world. Everyone needs more love and children need the love of both parents; let’s do this!❤️🙏❤️

How to Win Custody

HOW TO WIN CUSTODY – DRAFT PLEADINGS FOR COURT BASED ON DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE.

In a battle to be with your children? BM giving you the blues? False allegations?You have documented information? You’re inspired to fight? But you have no idea how to form that information into a decent Petition. I have been in that situation and I learned how to fight back from lost custody and I won full sole legal and physical custody.

In a previous post I explained WHY you want to know Civil Procedure and how to plead in court, and now I wanna show HOW I do that.

So, I wanna discuss how I would WEAPONIZE my documentation of BM shenanigans in a pleading for custody.

In this example we have a court order that states:

“When the child is with one parent, the parent without the child shall have the right to have a phone call visitation every evening between the hours of 6pm and 8pm. The parent with the child shall be responsible for facilitating each phone call.”

First off, every night I would call. If the parent will not answer or allow the call, I will at 8:01pm send an email to the parent stating,

“I am notifying you that I called to speak with lil’ baby at 6:52pm on 12/21/2019. There was no answer. I left a voicemail message. I waited and did not receive a call back.”

That is the entire extent of the documentation that I would need for my records.

When it is time for pleading, I may have, as I once had, over 200 incidents of this sort. So, I have options, and my concerns are balanced on need for aggressive self-representation, whether the judge might be annoyed by a 300 page petitions, whether the rules limit page sizes (many states and counties do, with exceptions), do I have the ink and paper for the copies etc.

I could plead out each individual violation separately for each day such as:

Now comes THE PETITIONER, appearing Pro Se, In his VERIFIED PETITION FOR CUSTODY AND SUPPORT. The PETITIONER seeks a change in custody of the MINOR CHILD based on a substantial change in circumstances pursuant to {STATUTE}. The petitioner seeks full, sole legal and physical custody of the minor child and support. And in support of which PETITIONER states as follows:

Count 1

Change of Custody due to repeated Visitation Interference

1. This court entered an order for custody, visitation and support on {DATE} (hereinafter “ORDER”). See Order Attached as Exhibit “A

2. The Order states in pertinent part:

a. Paragraph 15. “When the child is with one parent, the parent without the child shall have the right to have a phone call visitation every evening between the hours of 6pm and 8pm. The parent with the child shall be responsible for facilitating each phone call.”

3. On or about 6:52pm on 12/21/2019 pursuant to the order of this court PETITIONER called from number 888-888-8888 to telephone number 777-777-7777 to exercise telephone visitation with the MINOR CHILD.

4. No one answered the call on that day at that time.

5. PETITIONER left a voicemail message.

6. PETITIONER stayed with my phone between the hours of 6pm an pm.

7. RESPONDENT did not return PETITIONER’S call.

8. THE MINOR CHILD did not return PETITIONER’S call.

9. PETITIONER did not have phone visitation with the MINOR CHILD on 12/21/2019.

10. RESPONDENT failed to facilitate phone visitation on this day.

11. The continued practice of failing to facilitate phone communication fails to foster a loving and continuing relationship between me and the MINOR CHILD.

12. The continued practice of failing to facilitate phone communication diminishes a loving and continuing relationship between me and the MINOR CHILD.

13. Upon information and belief RESPONDENT willfully violated this condition of the agreement in a sustained attempt to alienate PETITIONER from a loving and continuing relationship with the MINOR CHILD.

14. RESPONDENTS Failure to allow phone visitation is not in the best interest of the MINOR CHILD.

Wherefore PETITIONER prays this court enter an order:

a) Finding that the RESPONDENT interfered with the visitation of the PETITIONER and the MINOR CHILD; and

b) Finding that the RESPONDENT fails to foster a continuing and loving relationship between the minor child and Petitioner; and

c) Finding that RESPONDENT interfered with the rights of the PETITIONER and MINOR CHILD to have visitation; and

d) Finding that RESPONDENT’S visitation interference is not in the best interest of the MINOR CHILD; and

e) Granting sole physical and legal custody of the minor; and

f) Granting Support entered against the RESPONDENT; and

g) Alternatively, for visitation to be made up by granting the PETITIONER up to 24 hours of physical overnight visitation;

h) And for any and all other relief this court deems fair, just and equitable.

AND so on and so forth. So sure, I could elect to file a 200-count complaint and lay out for each individual visitation interference. Though time and cost consuming for me (paper and ink), it would be more so for the other party. After all this is a copy and paste job. I could group like kinds of activity together in each count.

For that I would include a line for each date of violation in that count like:

3. On or about 6:52pm on 12/20/2019 pursuant to the order of this court PETITIONER called from number 888-888-8888 to telephone number 777-777-7777 to exercise telephone visitation with the MINOR CHILD.

4. On or about 7:19pm on 12/21/2019 pursuant to the order of this court PETITIONER called from number 888-888-8888 to telephone number 777-777-7777 to exercise telephone visitation with the MINOR CHILD.

5. On or about 6:02pm on 12/22/2019 pursuant to the order of this court PETITIONER called from number 888-888-8888 to telephone number 777-777-7777 to exercise telephone visitation with the MINOR CHILD.

6. No one answered the call on each of those days and times.

7. PETITIONER left a voicemail message on each and every day unless the voicemail was full.

8. PETITIONER stayed with my phone between the hours of 6pm an 8pm on each of these dates and times.

9. RESPONDENT did not return PETITIONER’S call on each of these dates and times.

10. THE MINOR CHILD did not return PETITIONER’S call on each of these dates and times.

11. PETITIONER did not have phone visitation with the MINOR CHILD on each of these dates and times.

12. RESPONDENT failed to facilitate phone visitation on each of these dates and times.

I would include in the prayer for relief:

g) Alternatively, for visitation to be made up by granting the PETITIONER up to 24 hours of physical overnight visitation FOR EACH VIOLATION;

ETC>>>

Obviously, other violations could take a similar shape in my petition. I’d make sure to describe only the things I know I can testify to. Basic rules of evidence state that a witness cannot testify to information not of a personal knowledge, with limited exceptions.

So, I make sure to form the count based on firsthand knowledge of actual events. I did not say for example, “RESPONDENT WOULD NOT ALLOW THE CHILD TO TALK TO ME.” That is not known to me and would violate the simple rule of evidence.

Here, there is a clear duty on the part of the other parent to act based upon the language of the order “facilitate calls.” There is a failure to act. That is what I know based upon my attempt to call.

The specifics about date and time are a road-map for discovery should these facts be disputed. This could be supported by phone records and a witness from the telephone company testifying to the accuracy of those records.

I do at one point make a statement of Belief based on my information at hand, “Upon information and belief RESPONDENT willfully violated this condition of the agreement in a sustained attempt to alienate PETITIONER from a loving and continuing relationship with the MINOR CHILD.”

Generally, this is how I would handle a verified complaint or affidavit; statements of fact and then letting the court and respondent know where I am making a statement of belief based upon information. I know I must have reasonable INFORMATION and BELIEF to state this in a verified complaint.

Sometimes this type of information must be submitted as an affidavit. In which case, I find, that the same general rules apply, statements of personal knowledge. The attach affidavit. Makes reference to the affidavit in the petition as Exhibit B. or the like.

All of this acts as a road-map for a GAL who when called to task must answer for an award of custody to a parent that would do this. They must also make findings about these allegations in their report.

Now the above example contemplates me having an order that the other parent is violating. So, that may not be the case. Even with no order I might make the case for custody based upon these same facts because they evidence a pattern of behavior by the other parent. Check your rules and laws for the way forward.

LISTEN, if a person does not plead a case, there is no case. If they do not put evidence and facts before the court properly there is nothing for the judge to rule on in favor of the party that failed to make a case. PERIOD. Stop being only on the defensive and make a case for your rights! For your child!

So, since I can not be in every state and country, I cannot know the laws and statutes for every state or pleading standards. I wish I could, but I don’t. (waiting on the Elon Musk Brain Implant for that. JK).

One must become familiar with their courts, statues and pleading standards in order to be able to take something from the internet, apply specific knowledge, and make it their own.

For example, “Foster a Loving and Continuing Relationship” was once language in the statute concerning custody in the state where I fought years ago. This may no longer be part of the statute. But if there is language within the statute that can be pointed to then I do that.

So, these are terms of art and terms of law that need to be understood form the perspective of the state/county in which a person is fighting. Look to your states statutes.

DO NOT USE INFORMATION FROM THE INTERNET AS A PLUG AND PLAY TEMPLATE. That’s stupid. I know because I have done it! Lol

What one could do is look at this as a strategy. Then look at actual pleadings from top law firms in one’s county/state for pleading standards and legal citations. You might be able to find them online. Or look in the courthouse. YOU CAN SURELY FIND THEM IN THE COURTHOUSE.

By the way, this is the same type of pleading of facts that I would use for the change in custody, petition to enforce order, contempt citation, etc.

But, nothing beats learning the law and civil procedure and the applying family law to that learning.

So, you may take my civil procedure series FOR FREE at http://www.professionallitigant.com/fathers

There’s nothing to buy. Just signup for FREE ACCESS to this video series and learn what I know about court. There is literally no catch. We typically change $997, But after seeing the types of questions and comments that go on in these groups, I recognize that this help is needed RIGHT NOW.

But remember, that series is not a course or a course on custody and family law. Nothing here or there is a substitute for legal advice.

Everyone who takes up this fight will need basic, rudimentary understanding of how courts work, or Civil Procedure.

Like this and please SHARE it with someone who might benefit from this information.

More to follow…

Jim Winner

Simply creating a foundation of solid parenting in the best interest

of the child.

U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households | Pew Research Center

Endangered :

Children and Elders .

It’s a cash cow, for all Corps and many

branches of behavioral health , which has adversely influenced

our laws, our society …

Purging this for review , due transforming, as a consciousness

and sanity replace this hell on earth for heaven in New Earth

Reality ….

©️

Blessings & Peace ✌️

Doña Luna

Almost a quarter of U.S. children under 18 live with one parent and no other adults, more than three times the share of children around the world who do so.
— Read on www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/12/12/u-s-children-more-likely-than-children-in-other-countries-to-live-with-just-one-parent/

True cases where Husband wins despite Domestic/ChildAbuse

Amy is a young Mom of 5, who is a powerful advocate .

She began a cause ,not to medicate pregnant women

with Psychiatric RX . Amy was awarded her efforts .

For years enduring a false intent that allows ex to

have primary custody , and still coming at her for

money …

Amy is through and brilliant in her efforts .. Educated

to practice law, in Texas , she was traumatized and pregnant

years ago , failing the bar test just as Court loomed and

their 2 sons were awarded to ex… like mine never stops the

abuse , total destruct of Amy …

I’ll share her new Facebook page , towards Mother-Child Rights

also. Perhaps worthy for any parent , as rulings teach us

of court systems …

©️ Doña Luna

Blessings & Peace

Doña Luna

digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi

Parental Alienation…it should be a crime | Insiders | tullahomanews.com

I strongly envision legal codes/law , enacted in the United

States , as it is in the United Kingdom .. Mim Of 5 years .

Non gender specific .

I plan to stand for this legislation in my home state of Virginia .

Parental alienation has been defined as the process and the end result of psychological manipulation of a child into showing, unwarranted fear, disrespect, hostility and even hatred towards a parent,
— Read on www.tullahomanews.com/content/tncms/live/

Why psychopaths can’t love their children, according to a psychologist – Business Insider

Weaponized Children , can and does #eraseFamiles , in the competing

of winner take all, secrets , lies , financial issues and adultery normalized

until now ..

Children deserve much better ..

Narcissists see their children as possessions rather than people, according to a psychologist.
— Read on www.businessinsider.com/narcissists-cannot-love-their-children-2017-7

Colorado mother tried for 15 months to protect murdered son from ex, but ‘nobody wanted to investigate’

Heartbreaking outcome for a protective Mom in Colorado this week. It’s good to see the Governor’s office paying attention to this investigation. Prayers up for Jing Tesoriero who fought hard in the courts for 15 months to protect her child from his violent father who repeatedly violated his protective order against the Mom without consequence. Her 10 yo son Ty was just murdered by his father in a vengeful murder suicide that took place less than one day AFTER the family court judge granted custody of Ty to his mother. COME ON people. Why can’t these judges get some f’ing common sense, and yes, some actual training to become “trauma- informed” in their judging.

In what parallel universe is it ever smart to hand a child over for the weekend to a grieving, violent, abusive father who just lost custody of his child? Douglas Co, Colorado Family Court has some serious ‘splaining to do. Our hearts go out to Jing and all who loved Ty. This was a CLEARLY preventable homicide if child safety had been the top priority in the judge’s decision-making. Rest in peace, sweet Ty. Another senseless tragedy, when will it ever cease?

Jing Tesoriero and her attorney had tried for more than a year to alert authorities that her husband was violating court orders over the custody of their son, according to new emails obtained by Denver7 on Thursday.
— Read on http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/local-news/colorado-mother-tried-for-15-months-to-protect-murdered-son-from-ex-but-nobody-wanted-to-investigate

Pauline Hanson wins fight to launch inquiry into Family Court

The US , should have someone vested in doing the same .

#ErasingFamilies for power/profit should cease .

Far more murder /homicide / suicide , or quietly muted

live the slow death of continued Domestic Abuse/ChildAbuse.

The grief is cellular , it is there every day , day in day out .

Winner takes all, never looks back, never stops targeting

Spiritually, Physically , Mentally and Financially, feeling

nothing but a desire to avenge a target 🎯that’s the focus

of all unresolved trauma, pain , anger , stemming from

lack of control ..bound in trauma , seeing no liberation

Rage, seethe , mask on for the public, for rage has its place

behind closed doors.

Nobody Sees? No one Knows ? Knowing too much in secretive

societies , they focus on destroying target .. Death the objective .

Let’s create a system in the US that does care ..

I’d love Virginia to lead the way ..

#StateForLovers?WhatAboutLove?

©️

Blessings & Peace ,

Doña Luna

Pauline Hanson wins fight to launch inquiry into Family Court
— Read on www.2gb.com/pauline-hanson-wins-fight-to-launch-inquiry-into-family-court/

Migrant Children Separated From Parents Show Signs Of PTSD, Report Finds | HuffPostll. ***Results are same of DomesticAbuseChildAbuse, CPS , Trafficked Children

Indeed these children , have been abused , fleeing abuse

then separated , and jailed like animals , sexually abused,

medicated, nutritionally abused, as well as separated from

parent(s) , relatives that is all they know .

Everything in the world .

So yes the avoidable FACT , is that all forms of Post

Traumatic Stress Disorder are induced , indeed a

Human Rights Violation .

The same results have been showing up for many years,

decades , and can no longer be ignored , will not be ignored .

Families are being erased , all that constitutes healthy family

foundations , in lieu of cashing in the many who profit

or as many professionals are lacking factual education,

and unfortunate result of a declining educational system .

Of repressed facts , of the adulteration of values , of faith

of nutrition, of our bodies and minds , which corporations

created chemicals for via RX , and physicians , following

the model of psychiatry, began the intense addiction of

folks , unknown to them…It was referred to as mental illness

these many varieties , induced trauma , ignoring and

blaming / targeting 1 person , as in my case supporting

my abuse by the partner who never was.

Results for our children , our collective children , are varied .

The possible results are the same for those children , snatched

by Child Protective Services ,

Family Court

Children who fly under the radar , in secrets family/social

support , in knowing or unknowing .

As well as immigration children , held in HELL on Earth .

Of course this demands attention , as it is ..

My personal intention to highlight this malicious,

malignant, high conflict , DomesticAbuseChildAbuse

through education , and legislation.

Until then, we Stand ..©️

Blessings & Peace 😘🙏🏼♥️☮️

Doña Luna

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/14/child-abuse-part-americas-official-immigration-policy

Not a fan of Ms Baker , I offer a view of C-PTSD and more resulting from

PAS-ChildAbuse

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/co-parenting-after-divorce/201304/the-impact-parental-alienation-children

CPS Lawless

https://youtu.be/PK5jJN-YzD0

The trauma pathogen prevents the brain from using logical reasoning and foresight.

Reasoning, foresight, and anticipating the future, are impossible for the trauma-impacted brain. Instead, it is fear oriented (amygdala driven rather than frontal lobe oriented) and they are now-oriented toward survival and anxiety-management rather that future-oriented through reasoning, planning.

So as we discuss implications of recent developments, here’s where we stand.

The methodology of all child forensic evaluations are in violation of Standard 9.01a of the APA ethics code, the methodology is invalid.

There is no inter-rater reliability. If an assessment procedure is not reliable – it cannot be valid. Child custody evaluations are not a valid assessment of anything.

Is tape recording sessions, reporting the transcript without professional analysis using any constructs from professional psychology, and writing recommendations that are not grounded in any established psychological constructs and principles a valid assessment of anything? No.

It is the opinion of one person based on no established constructs and principles. It is no more valid than asking your next door neighbor to make recommendations for custody.

The methodology – the methodology developed by forensic psychology for a “child custody evaluation” is in violation of many standards of the APA ethics code. Standard 9.01a regarding assessment, Standard 2.04 requiring the application of professional knowledge, Standard 3.04 on harm to the client, and Principle D of the APA ethics code regarding Justice.

I am required – required – by Standard 1.04 of the APA ethics code to “informally” contact the psychologist who’s practice is of concern to bring my concerns to their attention.

1.04 Informal Resolution of Ethical Violations

When psychologists believe that there may have been an ethical violation by another psychologist, they attempt to resolve the issue by bringing it to the attention of that individual.

That means that when I a serving as a consulting clinical psychologist for CRM or independently for an attorney and client and I review a child custody evaluation report, I am required by the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct of the American Psychological Association – which is a legally binding to me through my licensing board – to notify whoever wrote the report notifying them of my concerns.

My informal recommendation to the psychologist will be to stop doing child custody evaluations.

Now, here’s the important thing to understand. They should already know this. They should not have to be told, and they do not have to be told. They are all in violation of the APA ethics code today. All of them.

I’m going to be unpacking 3.04a Harm to the client shortly. That one is devastating to forensic psychology. Psychologists are not allowed to hurt anyone. Anyone. Not even terrorists Notice 3.04b.

Standard 3.04

(b) Psychologists do not participate in, facilitate, assist, or otherwise engage in torture, defined as any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person, or in any other cruel, inhuman, or degrading behavior that violates 3.04(a).

That came from the “enhanced interrogation techniques” used after 911. The APA said no, we cannot consult (“participate”) in harming anyone – even terrorists.

Targeted parents are people. Are you hurt by the recommendations of the custody evaluator?

It doesn’t matter if there was a “greater good” justification… that’s what Standard 3.04b directly addresses, a “greater good” justification NEVER works. We are not allowed to hurt anyone.

Were you – are you – will you be – hurt by the recommendations of the custody evaluator. They are not allowed to hurt you with their recommendation – Standard 3.04.

All of forensic psychology – all the custody evaluators – have also been in violation of Standard 3.04a of the APA ethics code on Harm to the client.

And they do not need to be told. They needed to know. Past tense. Too late now, I’m reading their report, the harm is done. The only question now is what to do about violation of the APA ethics codes, Standards 3.04a, 9.01a, and 2.04?

For each and every child custody report I read.

David with a rock.

Craig Childress, Psy.D.

Clinical Psychologist, PSY 18857

Blessings & Peace ,

Doña Luna

A government report found the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy caused serious mental health problems in detained children.
— Read on www.huffpost.com/entry/detained-migrant-children-border-mental-health-ptsd_n_5d6fc8dce4b09bbc9ef82c18