61 benefits of Marijuana

I was exposed to 1952 era termite spray in 2012 ; after assurances of not having to leave the house and developing flu like symptoms with in days , after being poisoned.

I am very careful not to allow infection deep into my chest and if I react to COVID shedding, or seasonal allergies I can cough up clear mucus which is rather thick but NOT infected !

Not infected though dry cough and clear film and very runny nose .

I include the many chemicals that exist in our environment that we know of and many we do not .

I’m lucky not to have inherited the COPD of my Dad and his Dad along with asthma . WHEW

I have not utilized marijuana all my adult life , but I’m not sorry for many of the listed pluses for its use have benefited me greatly .

Including not being able to eat from grief 🙏

So for me and many others it’s a natural Blessing that we pray doesn’t get adulterated like cigarettes ( 150 chemicals in each ) .

I don’t vape due to studies that indicate a negative side effect on the interior of lungs .

I am grateful for the Ozone treatments and have faith that the future holds more healing treatments than the past has afforded me .

I have major dental work to be done and that includes abscesses from heavy metal poisoning in a rental pre COVID

I am legal for Marijuana in the Commonwealth of Virginia!

* You know you and your body !

Blessings & Peace ☮️

Dona Luna

www.herbonaut.com/benefits-of-marijuana/

Worse outcome for diagnoses of ADHD

A teacher tried to diagnose middle son who was active but I did not feel overly so.

Our pediatrician prescribed Ritalin . In less than 1 week I flushed it down the toilet!

The change in our son was extreme and I have never been sorry to have prevented a travesty for such a unique , sweet child .

www.madinamerica.com/2022/10/adhd-diagnosis-leads-worse-quality-life-increased-self-harm-kids/

Sensitivity : Women vs Men

Little girls are constantly accessing their surroundings . Eyes , ears, hands , smell etc they are using all sensory from birth .

It is said that boys are more motor and physical and are not accessing their surroundings .

And then there is the super hyper sensitivity factor and many more babies have this extra ordinary sensitivity.

youtube.com/shorts/i9Optj5Ecw0

Crying

The advice from Dr Spock was to let baby cry up to 15 minutes . I tried this not knowing these horrific results .

There have been many advisors promoting detached parenting which is NOT what babies or children need not deserve .

Single Married Mama who had to be in the glow with a partner who had no idea or interest in parenting . Comfortable with brotherhood or uncle status that did not teach our sons well .

I regret not stopping everything to hold my baby , co sleep and had better intuitive skills that would have not allowed our sons to be alone with certain energies who masked many secrets

Crying it out: the foundation for NPD and BPD

(Borderline Personality Disorder

and Narcissistic Personality Disorder)

“One of the ways children have to adjust to a new order is called ‘letting them cry themselves out’.

The Mother puts the child into the crib at night to sleep. It is bedtime. But the sense of aloneness and the loss of contact with the mothers body terrifies the child, who begins to scream and cry.

No animal mother would fail to respond to a baby’s cry. Some human mothers believe, however that to respond would be wrong.

To give in to a child’s crying will spoil the child.

Besides, they have been told, crying is good for a child…

The first time this happens the child might cry for hours before falling asleep.

The mother might think the child has learned a lesson, but, the child doesn’t have the energy for a repeat performance…

After several experiences of this kind, the child learns to give up the struggle for contact with the mother. In effect, the child has cut off the longing for his contact and so no longer feels the pain of frustration.

A new reality in which the desire for intimacy and closeness is not expressed, has been accepted.

The foundations for narcissism and the borderline personality have been laid.”

Alexander Lowen,

Narcissism, Denial of True Self

Nutrition & Psychiatry

Long time coming ; I was discouraged from any vitamin intake . I used natural thyroid and was prescribed Synthroid, a human made product that does not address all the Ts lost in low thyroid .

Many have lost bone mass etc with the use of prescribed psychiatric drugs that do much harm in my 13 years of personal experience and in council with many who are altered physically and mentally and spiritually by these toxic compounds .

www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/nutritional-treatments-the-next-frontier-in-psychiatry

Masculine-Feminine YinYang Brain

The left side is your feminine, intuitive side and how you connect with your inner world. The right side is your masculine side and how you interact with the outer world. Please don’t overthink or analyze this. We’re doing so much cleansing and clearing. I suggest you release emotion the best you can, be in the moment, ask Spirit for help (which can come in the form of someone offering suggestions or you coming across a solution out of the blue) and follow your intuition as to what to do, knowing you’re protected and safe. This is what I do. 💜

Neuroleptics Psychopharmacology Explained

On the Psychopharmacology of Neuroleptics

Neuroleptics are major tranquilizers, neurological inhibitors, suppressants, and depressants of the central nervous system. Neuroleptics can neither cure nor prevent positive symptoms of schizophrenia, but rather neuroleptics suppress symptoms of schizophrenia or psychosis. Long term preventative or maintenance use of neuroleptics is not justifiable, particularly against the will of the person.

Neuroleptic means “nerve seizing”. Neuroleptics work to treat psychosis by disrupting normal brain function in the reward pathway, and in the mesocortical pathway –connecting to the frontal lobes (the part of our brains that make us human).

All the effects of a neuroleptic may be categorized as follows: mental & physical effects: the total effects of a neuroleptic are not best reduced to only the sum of its target effects and side effects but can instead be categorized as follows: target effects, short-term effects, long-term effects, withdrawal effects; where: target effects:= the mechanisms by which a neuroleptic produces its intended outcome may not be said to be mere “side effects”; these are rather the pharmacological target effects (intended).

Neuroleptics profoundly suppress brain function by occupying/blocking dopamine receptors and inhibiting neuronal function, thereby disrupting communication between neurons along dopaminergic pathways through either (exactly) one of the following mechanisms: antagonism (I.A. = 0%), or inverse-agonism (I.A. < 0%), or partial-agonism (0% < I.A. < 100%), thereby diminishing dopaminergic brain activity. Note: I.A. = intrinsic activity = the relative (%) extent activation of a receptor relative to dopamine receptor(s); where dopamine’s own intrinsic activity on a dopamine receptor: = +100%, by definition.

Neuroleptics block, i.e., put a brake on neurotransmission along dopaminergic pathways including the mesolimbic, i.e., “the reward pathway” and the mesocortical, which is the primary neural pathway to the frontal lobes – the most distinguishable part of the human brain! Neuroleptics block/occupy 70% – 90% of the brain’s dopamine D2 receptors. Thus, neuroleptics may not be said to be normalizing agents in the treatment of anything. Neuroleptics are chemical lobotomizers because they disconnect the frontal lobes from the rest of the brain by profoundly blocking the dopaminergic pathways of the brain, most notably the mesocortical pathway connecting to the frontal lobes via dopamine D2 receptor blockade (with 70% – 90% dopamine D2 receptors occupied at therapeutic doses). Lobotomy, whether surgical or chemical (via neuroleptic) results in dysfunction of the frontal lobes – the part of our brain that makes us human!

Neuroleptics exert their pharmacological target effects by occupying dopamine receptors, inhibiting/deactivating them, resulting in a suppression/reduction of dopaminergic receptor activity, via antagonism, or inverse-agonism, or partial-agonism, in each case dampening down dopaminergic neurotransmission: i.e., disrupting normal brain function along the dopamine pathways: the mesolimbic (i.e., “the reward pathway”), the mesocortical pathway (connecting to the frontal lobes), the nigrostriatal pathway (target of antiparkinsonian agents), and the tuberoinfundibular pathway (endocrine function / hormonal balance). Neuroleptics impair mental functions such as emotions, affect, feelings, cognition, memory, attention, focus; they slow up and dampen down all thinking processes, reducing thought tempo, one’s ability to learn, study, perform on mental tasks and tests, reduce intelligence quotient (IQ) etc.

Neuroleptics do not exert their therapeutic (pharmacological target effects on psychosis (positive symptoms of schizophrenia) by rectifying a brain abnormality, such as a chemical imbalance, nor do they target any physiological process that produces the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, but rather neuroleptics suppress symptoms of schizophrenia by a by a profound slowing up and dampening down of mental processes putting a brake on dopaminergic neurotransmission – they arrest natural brain function.

A neuroleptic induces disorder of diminished motivation, suppresses all thinking processes, degrades a person’s intelligence and executive functional capacity for higher order thinking (ex., complex problem solving, philosophizing, planning/organizing, etc.), incapacitates the mind (i.e., diminishes intelligence, impairs memory, attention, concentration, significantly decreases IQ level), disables the brain, causes significant brain shrinkage as well as a reduction in the number of connections to the pre-frontal cortex, resulting in loss of executive functioning, cognitive impairment, and decline. Moreover, neuroleptics induce “neuroleptic-induced deficit disorder”: a syndrome characterized by the same symptoms that constitute so called “negative symptoms of schizophrenia”; its symptoms include anhedonia (i.e., loss of pleasure), avolition (i.e., loss of will), cognitive impairment, impoverishment of thought & speech, etc.

Neuroleptics cause severe impairment in cognitive function, degrade one’s executive functional capacity, cause disorder of diminished motivation, blunt feelings (ex., pleasure) and flatten emotions, slow up and dampen down thinking processes (ex., slow down thought tempo), cause psycho-sexual dysfunction affecting all phases of sexual functioning including libido (sex-drive), arousal, and orgasm, etc. These are not mere “side effects” or “adverse effects”, but rather the mechanism by which neuroleptic drugs produce their intended outcome. Neuroleptics exert their target (i.e., therapeutic/intended) effects in a global rather than a specific manner: for example, in treating delusions, neuroleptics suppress a person’s general ability to think, and do not just target delusional thoughts specifically.

Benefits/Advantages (non-existent, dubious at best, based on a false narrative of science).

Risks/Harms (causes more harm than good, not in the best interests of the person being involuntarily treated, violates fundamental human and civil rights.)

Neuroleptics are not a cure for schizophrenia and do not even qualify as treatments for it some of the time. Neuroleptics do not treat schizophrenia by rectifying any underlying abnormality: ex., a bio-chemical imbalance such as according to the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia, according to which an overactive dopaminergic system is the primary cause of schizophrenia. Neuroleptics are not treatments in the sense of being curative agents, they cannot cure any condition; they are not disease specific treatments for schizophrenia; they are not like antidotes to psychosis. They might work to curb/suppress positive symptoms of schizophrenia/psychosis (ex., delusions, hallucinations), but that depends on the context, what the intended outcome is and who is intending the outcome. Their target effects in treating schizophrenia are slow up and dampen down the dopaminergic neurotransmitter system by blocking/occupying dopamine receptors by antagonism, inverse agonism, or partial agonism, which results in an inhibition of the dopaminergic pathways of the brain. Any effects induced by the pharmacological target effects of neuroleptics cannot be said to be “side effects” because they are the ‘main’ effects and the intended effects; the target effects of a neuroleptic are the mechanisms by which the neuroleptic exerts its main intended effects. No definition for “side effects” could reasonably include the target effects of the neuroleptic. They can, however, be called ‘adverse’ effects in that they are unfavourable effects, which include the disadvantages and risks of treatment with the neuroleptic.

Even while being considered treatments for schizophrenia, under some definitions of treatment, they are however not effective treatments as such; plus, neuroleptics as a class of psychiatric drugs are not much more effective than a placebo but are the most toxic pharmaceutical drugs available by prescription apart from chemotherapy for cancer. There is insufficient evidence for the long-term safety and efficacy of neuroleptics in treating schizophrenia/psychosis. The bulk of research on their safety and efficacy is based on short-term studies (6-8 weeks), and the evidence on their long-term safety and efficacy is lacking: conflicted, at best inconclusive due to some evidence indicating it and other evidence contraindicating it (i.e., indicating against it): i.e., the evidence in favour is conflicted, contradictory, and inconclusive.