Don’t Walk Away from your Life – When Ex creates Ex Mother it’s Child Abuse

Stats don’t lie-
70% of children who have been emotionally cut off
from a parent , experience severe depression ,
suicidal thoughts and self harm .
Abused children , whose legacy of fear has
been implanted , and clouded all .
Awaken to the Power of Change .
🌲in my feed on fb , there were at least 5
parents , sharing reunification joy this
Christmas morning 👍🏼😍🥳🥰
More than hope , I have faith in the best possible
outcome …
©️ Blessings & Peace
Doña Luna
The following post by Craig Childress , Psy.D.
Don’t walk away.  You will also need to find your balance, your center.  I cannot speak to your specific situation, but I can speak to the general patterns of the pathology.
Children love them moms, there is zero doubt on that, children love their dads, there is zero doubt of that.
Children in this pathology are receiving exceptionally bad parenting from a pathological parent – the pathology of the parent originates in their own unresolved childhood trauma, and it is activated by the divorce (rejection and abandonment by the spousal attachment figure).
The allied parent creates “sides” surrounding the divorce, and then subtly yet powerfully manipulates the children into taking “sides” surrounding the spousal conflict.  The ultimate goal is to punish the ex-spouse for the failed marriage and divorce, using the child as the weapon.
The brutal IPV spousal abuse (Intimate Partner Violence; “domestic violence” emotional abuse) of the allied parent requires that the ex-wife become an ex-mother, that the ex-husband become an ex-father, a split in the family.  This is a symptom of a type of neurological symptom of personality pathology, called “splitting.”
The family is transitioning from its prior intact family to a new separated family structure.  There are two possible transitions, the first to a healthy separated family structure in which the child unites the two families through bonds with mom and bonds with dad.
The other transition is pathological, it is to a “cutoff” family structure – the emotional cutoff is a construct of family systems therapy described by Murray Bowen – there is a Bowen Center website with information about family systems constructs (triangles and emotional cutoff are most relevant, differentiation of self and multi-generational trauma are additional second level constructs for this pathology).
The allied parent creates a loyalty conflict for the children.  Professional psychology should not allow that to happen, a family therapist should be able to manage the situation and keep the children out of the family conflict.  However… the allied parent will not allow family systems therapy to be effective. They won’t consent to it, they won’t consent to a knowledgeable therapist and they won’t allow successful therapy to be successful.  There are a variety of ways they will undermine therapy.
If the child has a fixed and false belief in supposed “victimization” by a normal-range parent, that represents a persecutory belief.  The next diagnostic question is, does it represent a persecutory delusion?  If the allied parent is creating a persectory delusion (called an “encapsulated” delusion because it affects only one area of functioning), then that would represent a DSM-5 diagnosis of V995.51 Child Psychological Abuse.
Creating psychotic-delusional pathology in the child (a persecutory delusion toward a normal-range parent) is not okay.  That is extremely bad parenting (called “pathogenic parenting” – creating pathology in the child through aberrant and distorted parenting practices),  
That’s psychological child abuse.  Creating delusional-psychotic pathology in the child in order to destroy the child’s bond to the other parent in order to use the child as a weapon of spousal abuse… is child psychological abuse.
In all cases of child abuse, we protectively separate the child from the abusive parent, recover the child’s healthy development that was damaged by the child abuse, we then restore the relationship with the formerly abusive parent with enough safeguards to ensure that the child abuse will not resume when contact is restored.
Currently, however, the mental health professionals surrounding these families are stunningly ignorant and incompetent – and entirely slothful, apathetic and lazy.  They don’t care. They are exploiting these families financially, they solve nothing.
So parents are left alone and without solutions. Their family situations continue to deteriorate because there is no effective intervention from professional psychology… because all of foresnic psychology is abjectly ignorant and incompetent.  
We’re looking to bring knowledge to solve pathology.  Because the mental health people are so incredibly lazy and professionally slothful, we then have to begin by teaching parents what the pathology is, so that parents can do it on their own, without any help from professional psychology, and perhaps… educate… the mental health person who is treating their family about things that the mental health person should ALREADY know.
None of that is good.  None of that should be happening.  All of that is in multiple violation of Standards of the APA ethics code (2.04, 2.01a, 2.03, 9.01a, 3.04).  They don’t care. The APA doesn’t care, licensing boards don’t care, the mental health people don’t care.
In addition, if parents try to educate their mental health professional, they risk a narcissistic injury toward their mental health professional (exposing their inadequacy) prompting retaliation – retaliation – from the mental health professional for trying to educate them.
It’s bad.
Do not walk away.  The disorientation you are feeling is accurate and legitimate.  You will need to find your center and your balance.  Dorcy Pruter has solutions that can be helpful.
Show up, continue to show up.  You must become an informed consumer.  We are working on things on the mental health and legal solution side, for assessment and diagnosis, leading to effective treatment.  Therapy should always be guided by a – written – treatment plan with specified goals, time frames for accomplishing those goals, interventions for achieving those goals, and outcome measures for measuring goal accomplishment.
This is standard of practice everywhere else in professional psychology, except here, except in this court-involved family confli pathology – forensic psychology. They do not use treatment plans, they do not diagnose pathology, it is a mess.
Moms are not expendable from the lives of their children, dads are not expendable from the lives of their children.  You all are the moms, you all are the dads, your kids love you, no doubt, no worries on that. They are trapped, caught in the pathology of a parent who is struggling with the rejection and abandonment of divorce.
Moms and dads, you are the child’s authentic parents, the chosen parents, chosen by the child to lead the family into solutions following divorce, because the other parent is too fragile, they’re not a good parent.  The child is caught, trapped.  The child is looking to you.
If parents twirl in the abuse and trauma (parents are being abused and traumatized by this, it is IPV spousal abuse, a brutal form of emotional abuse using the child as the weapon), then the child has no one to rescue them.  Parents should be receiving massive help from professional psychology – they are receiving no help from professional psychology – zero.
Continue to show up.  Always show up.
Craig Childress, Psy.D.
Clinical Psychologist, PSY 18857

How Migrant Children in Federal Custody Will Spend Christmas | Time

Many children /adults are abused on Christmas …

More than 14,000 migrant children will spend the Christmas in U.S. government detention and processing centers across the country.
— Read on time.com/5485344/migrant-children-christmas/

The Spiritual Within The Narcissist Experience Of Abuse

Anxiety denotes the awakening of spirit .

My anxiety born of abuse was medicated with Xanax .

Xanax allowed me to become an addict very quickly due

to my extreme sensitivity ..

5 per day for 2 weeks created a chemically induced

nervous breakdown.

On that day in April , and in my incarceration in a mental

ward( Hell on earth for 17 days ) , I was shown signs of spirit .

*The nurse who rushed a fellow patient who was going

to choke me , whispering in my ear ” honey you don’t belong

here”!

My eventual Christian room mate who had such peace

that helped me to calm down enough to know I had to

go home , to Mother our sons , for there was nothing to

heal me me there .. I knew the truth of who I was married

to and how vicious he’d be in a divorce , and so I surrendered

to trying to work things out .

I am not discounting my behaviors , The betrayal of many years

was suspected , behaviors were abusive and horrific , when

the mask was fully revealed 3 months in 24 legal years

of marriage to a stranger ..My concern and compassion

my fears and tears and love were not enough , and I understand

that fully now.

Narcissist are Dark Angels , Survivors Of Trauma ; unhealed .

I have been trying to step out of this shadow , and spiritually

have deepened my faith…in myself …in my efforts and so many

who strive to push through Domestic Abuse/ChildAbuse .

Some find my journey inspiring , Some back off as if it’s catching,

Some are triggered and catalyzed to heal their own families.

Some are fearful of actions they are not sorry for , only

sorry to be found out..exposed . Part of why I had the

negative experience , a partner who wasn’t …

Others are overwhelmed with my varied negative experiences

and my ability to continue to move forward …That does get

more difficult in repeated attempts to impede my progress

and guidance tells me , more positive energy awaits , and

I may have to endure abuse to get there .

Thy Will Is Done

©️

Blessings & Peace ,

Doña Luna 🎄🎁

www.youtube.com/watch

https://youtu.be/RT-MOY4wzeA

Holidays and the Narcissist

The lovely memories of Christmas past within

our family have been covertly destroyed in

my non allowance to participate or be acknowledged .

To do so would dishonor the ever present

hatred of Mother and Son , to whom all bow.

He brags in court about how much he spends

well aware of his power; Tis unfortunate that

this escapes the judge .

In my experience within this ” relationship”

year after year of watching as his gifts were presented

in unlimited expenditures, and a token singular gift

given our sons or myself. Gifts from him were

thoughtless , impersonal or later on tweaked by

someone else’s gift…What’s perceived as a loving gift

by a man who has it all, is contrived and cheap

lacking thought, it was just another show.

Our last 5 Christmas as a family , I did not participate

in holidays , for I lived day today , medicated into

a submission that he could advantage while he made

his plans to extract himself . As those 5 years wound

down , Mom heard of his victimhood and of course

rescued him without a pause ..Trauma Bound ?

Perhaps .

From birthdays to sacred holidays to observing Mothers

Day , the Grinch who stole holidays, sucks happiness

and joy , much less light out of his ladies.. Shameful

it’s allowed , shameful it still serves him and ” his”

family , to reduce the Mother of his sons that he is

Mother/Father/God .

I’m clearly knowing many truths are going to be highlighted

and much effort will be put in front of me to block if not

kill me .

I don’t feel I have a choice , in lieu of on going abuse.

I don’t celebrate Christmas as I used to ..I have tried

but it’s not the same in many regards .

©️

Blessings & Peace

Doña Luna

www.youtube.com/watch

Maternal Infection During Pregnancy: Increased Risk of Psychosis in Offspring | Psychiatric Times

Targeting Mom is a APA mantra . Let’s look at generations

addicted to Psychiatric RX , ignorance of Trauma , avoidance

of masculine responsibility in any part of creation .

The DSM is full of sexist hocus pocus .

Maternal viral infection during pregnancy is a risk factor for schizophrenia. But there has been relatively less research on the association between maternal bacterial infection during pregnancy and psychosis risk.
— Read on www.psychiatrictimes.com/schizophrenia/maternal-infection-during-pregnancy-increased-risk-psychosis-offspring

Cheaters: Jo Sutch

Cheaters say the darndest things. If you’ve ever had the misfortune of being cheated on, you’ve probably found yourself gobsmacked at the excuses cheaters give. Haven’t you wanted the perfect rejoinder?

Wouldn’t you love to know what’s going on inside their noggins to make them spout such nonsense?

Well, wonder no more. Here’s five stupid things cheaters say and how to respond. I didn’t intend to hurt you. Hurting you was unintentional? Cheating is about as deliberate as a NATO airstrike.

There’s nothing unintentional about secret cell phones, dating profiles, diverted monies, and clandestine hook-ups. It takes a lot of planning and premeditation to cheat.

What was unintentional was you finding out about it.

Cheaters prefer the passive voice language of “mistakes were made” after discovery. (No pronouns, no responsibility!) In the real world, people don’t just accidently land on each other’s genitals. It’s not a “mistake” or something that “just happened.” That sort of language distances cheaters from personal responsibility for their crappy choices. “I didn’t intend to hurt you” is gas lighting with some blame shifting thrown in for good measure. Hey, hurting you wasn’t a conscious choice. If you want to interpret what I did as hurtful, well, that’s on you. But it’s not how I intended it.

See how this trick works? The onus shifts from the cheater (who didn’t intend to hurt you) to you (a person who has mistakenly taken offense where offense wasn’t intended). Left out of the equation is that they did something offensive. “I didn’t intend to hurt you” is a gem of impression management.

Yes, they are cheaters, but not bad people. It’s not like they go around feeling like Dr. Evil, plotting your downfall. Hurting you was completely beside the point! You’re a bit of collateral damage, that’s all; so don’t take it so hard. What’s important to remember is that the cheater is still a splendid person.

The fact is they didn’t care if they hurt you. Not enough. They did the risk benefit analysis and screwing around won out over your feelings every time. Response “Your intentions are irrelevant. You knew full well that cheating on me would hurt me, which is why you kept it a secret.

You didn’t intend to hurt me? Well, you didn’t intentionally try to keep me from harm either.” I love you but I’m not in love with you.

A classic. Translated it means — “I did unloving things, but telling you ‘I love you’ makes me feel better about them.” I love you but I’m not in love with you is simply impression management. It has nothing to do with you. This is about maintaining the cheater’s self image.

And it softens the blow — hey, you wouldn’t impose consequences on someone who loves you, would you? They think they’re letting you down gently. Cheater love is a compartmentalized kind of love — “I love you, but I put that aside while I was screwing someone else.” The two things aren’t at all connected.

Why should “love” get in the way of a good time? We naively assume that people who love us act like they love us. Cheaters subvert that assumption and turn it back on you. “But I’m not in love with you” is a subtle blame shift. “I don’t feel giddy and effervescent.

I need sparkles. Alas, if you had only twinkled brighter, perhaps it would not have come to this.” It’s so disappointing the way you’ve let them down. What can you do to make it up to them? “I love you, but I’m not in love with you” is your cue to perform the “pick me” dance. They may be dumping you anyway for the affair partner, but some parting ego strokes would be nice. The subtle mindf*ck of “I love you but I’m not in love with you” is that it’s not definitive. It’s pure cake speak. They aren’t saying, “Hey, I love someone else. It’s over. I’m sorry.” No, there is an opening — they love you. Just not in that way. It’s a deliberate confusion, this whole torn between two lovers schtick. It keeps the cheater in cake and makes their desires central. The cheater can feel very noble about their love for you in the face of your inadequacies.

They’d like credit for that higher sentiment — but they’re unburdened by their commitments because King’s X! — they’re not in love with you. “I’m not in love with you” is a justifiable reason to a cheater for casting about and loving someone else.

So, which came first? The falling out of love, or the permission they gave themselves to cast about? We all know grown-up love means not feeling “in love” all the livelong day. There are no butterflies when you’re doing taxes, or visiting the in-laws, or cleaning up after a kid’s stomach flu.

Response Don’t try to parse with your cheater which parts of you they love or what their butterflies are saying to them today — state what you need. “I need to be in a relationship where I am fully loved and respected. You don’t love me the way I deserve to be loved. Buh-BYE.” Don’t ask yourself what you did to be so unlovable. Don’t dance the pick me dance. Just let them go. I’m sure their butterflies will be migrating again soon. We could have an open marriage. Monogamy isn’t natural. It’s one thing to begin with an open marriage. It’s quite another to have it thrust upon you after the discovery of an affair. This “offer” is not sexual sophistication, it’s an implied threat — let me have my cake, or we’re through. The cheater lays the blame with monogamy — that impossible condition that, oh hey, we all agreed to.

The problem isn’t monogamy. The problem is that the cheater unilaterally changed the terms of the marriage agreement. You are presented with a choice now, which at least is out in the open. Agree to let your spouse have multiple partners, and you can enjoy the same, or end the relationship. If you accept the open arrangement, you would need to negotiate the sort of terms that polyamorists set, such as, am I the primary relationship? Who is an acceptable partner? Can we ask mutual friends? How much time is spent on extracurriculars?

How do we manage risk for STDs, etc.? But the problem there is you’d be negotiating relationship terms with someone who just demonstrated to you that they couldn’t be trusted. They behave unilaterally and change the terms of agreed upon arrangements (like monogamous marriage). Open relationships are based on trust too. So what do you want?

Do you want a monogamous relationship? If so, stand up for that. Response “I’m not going to get sidetracked with a discussion about how natural monogamy is. You agreed to monogamy, and let me play by those rules, and changed them for yourself.

That’s a matter of character, not monogamy. If you don’t wish to be monogamous, I appreciate your candor. I do want a monogamous relationship. We’re incompatible.” If you met him/her — you’d really them! He/she’s a lot like you! Of all the stupid things cheaters say, this is among the more patently moronic.

Oh yeah, if this person wasn’t screwing your spouse, you could be best friends. Besides the obvious insult — do you really think I have less moral sense than God gave dryer lint? — it’s propaganda to convince you that the affair partner is a really good person. Why would your cheater assert something so ridiculous? Because they’re minimizing. Hey, the cheater is a good person, the affair partner is a good person.

They’re all just good people caught up in something larger than them both. Where is your compassion? This person is just like you. Someone you could really like if you’d get over your prejudice. “You’d like them!” says a lot about your cheater’s narcissistic worldview. You’re all just interchangeable really, united in your love for the cheater. One’s as good as the next, but what matters here is the centrality of the cheater. Wouldn’t it be great if you were all friends together supplying the cheater kibbles? A cake fantasy come to life!

Response “I’m nothing like your f*ckbuddy. I don’t sleep around with married people.” I need to mourn the end of the affair. Oh hell to the no. Of all the pernicious entitlements, this one rises to the top.

The argument goes that cheaters, when they end an affair (or more likely, are dumped), are in a state of withdrawal. It’s a real “loss” and if you’re a good spouse, you’ll help them through it. Pass a hanky, be a shoulder to cry on. If you can’t manage that, you churlish chump, the least you can do is understand that they’re “grieving.” I’m not saying cheaters don’t mourn the end of their covert hook-ups. I’m sure the loss of cake is utterly tragic. What I’m saying is why should you give a flip?

You’re mourning too — your marriage as you knew it, the loss of trust, your sense of personal safety — and the difference is this nightmare was inflicted on you.

Your losses are not equivalent. What your cheater is suffering is completely self-inflicted. It’s like the story of the man who kills his parents and then wants clemency from the court for being an orphan. It is the worst kind of delusional grandiosity to expect that the person you grievously harmed be the same person to comfort you.

When I hit you in the head with that hammer, I cut my hand. Will you bring me a band-aid and kiss my boo boo? We would think such a scenario ridiculous, and yet there are people out there who encourage chumps to accept this affair loss “grief” and be sympathetic. Why? Because they don’t see affairs as decisions — like say, hitting a person in the head with a hammer.

That’s so overtly unkind! Unlike screwing around and risking a person’s health, which hey, is just a thing that happens with no aforethought whatsoever.

Response You mourn the affair partner? You mourn alone. “Go mourn about your affair somewhere else. It’s not my job to comfort you from the affliction of your own stupidity. I’ve got my own healing to do, which apparently isn’t even on your radar.”

We’ve Been Tracking Pharma Payments to Doctors For Nearly A Decade. We Just Made A Big Breakthrough. — ProPublica

Head psychiatrist clear tons for writing scrips

For years, we’ve wondered whether a doctor who received a payment linked to a particular drug prescribed more of that drug. With our new analysis, we finally have the answer: yes.
— Read on www.propublica.org/article/weve-been-tracking-pharma-payments-to-doctors-for-nearly-a-decade-we-just-made-a-big-breakthrough