GreatCosmicMothersUnite

At a wonderful suggestion and through my Internet fragility, I tell ya, I’m such an idiot, I will now start adding topics to my posts.

Perhaps one day a minion person can go through the past posts of note and Topic them if they’re valuable, but at least going forward, I’ll give all my posts to this Facebook Group at least one topic. I may revisit some issues over time just for ease of having the Topic reference content.

Here are the topic categories I will be starting with. Less categories is good, but enough categories is helpful.

Four broad categories: Parents; Mental Health Professionals (MHP); Legal Professionals; Resources.

I am going to have a fifth Topic category for Dorcy’s work, labeled, CCPI (Conscious Co-Parenting Institute). This will entail my posts about the High Road protocol, the Custody Resolution Method, the Higher Purpose Parenting curriculum, and the network of family coaching support.

Within each of these broad categories will be a next-level set of categories:

Parents: Resources

Parents: Truth

Parents: Children

MHP: Attachment Pathology

MHP: Complex Trauma Pathology

MHP: Family Systems Therapy

MHP: Personality Disorders

MHP: Assessment

MHP: Diagnosis

MHP: Treatment

Legal: Psychology Package

Legal: Considerations (from Psychology)

Legal: Resources

Resources

CCPI: High Road

CCPI: CRM

CCPI: HPP

CCPI: Family Coaching

I am going to add one more Topic category regarding the Petition to the APA.

Petition to the APA

I anticipate that this is going to become an emerging issue at some point. Major media has not yet activated. There is a whole ‘nother line of force on its way, Dateline – 60 Minutes type of expose on corruption in forensic psychology and the cover-up from the APA.

Dum-dee-dum, no hurry on that. It’ll arrive when it gets here. Media absolutely loves institutional corruption and cover up stories. Once they get on to this story, the string they pull on (custody evaluations) will unravel some pretty distasteful professional incompetence… and its cover up by the APA?

That’s the decision currently before the APA in the Petition to the APA. It’s their Catholic church sex abuse scandal moment. What does the APA choose to do?

Does the APA come clean on professional standards of practice, support Standard 2.01a of the their own ethics code, and come to the support of parents seeking professional competence?

Or does the APA remain silent, abandon their own ethics code, abandon parents to the ignorance and incompetence of forensic psychology, and abandon tens and hundreds of thousands of children to child abuse and destroyed childhoods?

Decision time, APA. That which is hidden will be revealed. That’s the purpose and function of AB-PA. It is going to do its job. AB-PA will reveal that which is hidden. Watch.

Main stream media has yet to arrive. They will. And when they arrive I will have wonderful “sound-bite” worthy statements for them about corruption in forensic psychology and the abuse of children – and about the abuse of targeted parents by forensic psychology.

This is not new. I have blogs going back years discussing the severely problematic issues with child custody evaluations. They know, forensic psychology knows what it’s doing (gouging parents for invalid assessments)… and what they’re not doing (not solving anything).

But what they will soon be waking to is the different world in which their abuse of parents, and their collusion with child abuse, will no longer be tolerated, and will be exposed. Uh-oh for them.

Forensic psychology has emotionally abused targeted parents and has colluded with the psychological abuse of children. Shame is coming.

Forensic psychology, the sooner you see the truth and begin adopting basic professional standards of practice, the less will be your shame. I share in that shame. As clinical psychologists we also abandoned these families. But now clinical psychology is here. We will do the right thing – now. Today.

Forensic psychology, you have a choice. APA, you also have a choice.

Truth has a way of… becoming known. And truth has force.

So I’m adding a special Topic for my Facebook posts on the Petition to the APA, because I suspect this is going to become an important topic moving forward, especially once the major media arrive.

Craig Childress, Psy.D.

Clinical Psychologist, PSY 18857

Let me begin to challenge a lie the pathogen is saying about me.

I’ve tolerated the lie for a while because I wanted to see were the allies of the pathology were. I think most of them are exposed now, so it’s time to brush aside the lie and move into solution.

The pathogen hides, it is exposed on attack. I have constructed… bait. AB-PA is bait for the pathogen’s inevitable attack. It’s designed specifically for these attacks.

The lie of the pathogen that I want to address in this post is that “Dr. Childress says it has to be ONLY his way.”

Have you heard that one? They’ll say that “Dr. Childress is okay, I guess, but I disagree that it has to be ONLY HIS way.”

You’ve heard that, right?

Rubbish. Your way, my way, his way, her way, I’m fine with that. Woo hoo. If you have a solution, bring it. So, what’s your solution?

<crickets>

Tell us, please. What is your other solution?

<crickets>

The pathogen lies. It lies a lot. It lies all the time. They have no solution. The pathogen is simply trying to keep us in no-solution by preventing solution. If you have a solution, woo hoo, tell us what it is.

If you’re a parent and you don’t know that the pathogen lies, a lot, in fact, the pathogen lies all the time… if your a parent and don’t know that.. god help ya. You all know it lies.

I’m not going to be swatting at the pathogen’s lies about me all the time, that’s what it wants. The attacks are to put me on the defensive. They are manipulative, not authentic. They are not grounded in actual reality.

But it’s time for me to knock this one out of the air.

Let me give you one piece of lock-solid evidence that completely refutes the “ONLY Dr. Childress solution” nonsense the pathogen spouts.

Dorcy Pruter developed an entirely separate and different solution from Dr. Childress. Completely different top-to-bottom. High Road instead of my therapy, a Parenting Course curriculum that I don’t have, the Custody Resolution Method instead of my treatment-focused assessments, and coaches instead of my approach with family therapists.

Completely different top-to-bottom. And look what happened. I have embraced her solutions, all of them. Because they actually solve things.

I don’t care. Your solution, my solution, their solution. I absolutely don’t care… just so it’s a solution. Because we are soooo done with no-solution. The ONLY thing I care about is a solution.

So pathogen spouting person… what’s your solution. Tell us.

<crickets>

See how AB-PA exposes the pathogen on attack? It’s not on the first attack. AB-PA is designed to simply absorb the first attack. It’s the follow ups.

Once the pathogen attacks, it’s poked its head out of the hiding place, it’s crevices of darkness, anger, and malevolence. There you are, pathogen. Let me get my tongs and gloves and… pull… out you come from the mental health system response to this pathology.

“Dr. Childress insists it has to be HIS way.” Lie. I’ve caught it in the lie. Now I just need to expose it.

Your way, my way, doesn’t matter. So. Tell us. What is your solution?

<crickets>

Exposed.

The attack “”peer-reviewed research” works the same way, as does “new theory” – and this one; “the only way” nonsense attack. And the others… I’m waiting on their emergence, but since the pathogen is trauma it’s running through the most familiar patterns.

The “only way” one is interesting, because it reveals something about how the trauma pathogen, which replicates pattern, creates new. (I’ll give you a hint, it’s through projection; it creates new by using projection, shh don’t tell anybody).

Now if you’re following along with me as a “junior psychologist” (hopefully most of you have gotten your Dr. C psychologist decoder rings by sending in your cereal boxtops), you’ll know that the pathogen attacks, and it’s exposed on attack, in this way we’re going to expose the trauma pathogen in the allies of the pathology, the ones who are colluding in no-solution.

You also know that the pathogen’s attacks are pattern structures, because it can’t actually think. It repeats patterns. So it’s using the same exact attacks against Childress and AB-PA that it used against Gardner and PAS – notice the superficial “similarity”? – I mimicked to trap. Childress and AB-PA – Garner and PAS. Entirely different content, in fact 100% different content, I made absolutely sure of that – but same outside “package” structure.

The pathogen’s stupid. It won’t understand the content, just the packaging.

It’s bait. To hook pattern. I’m pathogen hunting. Come out, come out wherever you are…

It’s not enough in our solution to simply cleanse the pathogen from the families… we need to also cleanse the pathogen from professional psychology – who are the allies who are supporting the pathology? We’re going after the allies as well.

First step… identify who they are.

That’s the role of AB-PA. It’s an “ally identifier” in professional psychology. It will identify your allies, and it will identify the pathogen’s allies.

Your Allies: three diagnostic indicators.

Pathogen’s allies: not the three diagnostic indicators.

It’s NOT either-or.. it’s and. Do whatever you want… AND… what are the three diagnostic indicators? Either-or is polar; it’s the splitting pathology. Very distinctive once you recognize… either-or.

No, stupid pathogen… and. Do whatever you want. And… what are the three dignostic indicators? Are they present, absent, or somewhat present in the child’s symptom display? ADD whatever else you want, do whatever you think is best… and…

The pathogen’s first attack will attack “new theory” (pattern from PAS). That will fall flat, because AB-PA doesn’t exist.

I vanish AB-PA into Bowlby, Minuchin, Beck, van der Kolk. No “new theory” pathogen, just your ignorance.

I’m using the vulnerability of the pathogen – it can’t think, the frontal lobe executive functioning systems are being inhibited – it hasn’t learned the knowledge of professional psychology… it’s a pretender. I’m using this to expose it on attack.

It’s vulnerable in its ignorance, and it attacks. I’m combining these, baiting attack onto knowledge.

It thinks it’s attacking Gardner-PAS structure: Childress AB-PA instead of Gardner PAS.

No, I’ve tricked it. Because I knew it attacks. I’ve used AB-PA as bait, the pathogen is going to wind up attacking Bowlby, and Minuchin, and Beck, and van der Kolk – i.e., the top-top tier of professional knowledge.

Stupid pathogen, it’s not a “new theory” – you’re just ignorant.

See how the Curriculum Knowledge Checklist fits in? See where my video series on Family Systems Therapy fits in. I’m standing on… the foundations… of the standard and established knowledge of professional psychology. Because I know the pathogen attacks. It has three defensive structures:

1. Remain hidden

2. Seek allies

3. Attack threat of exposure with great viciousness

I’m going after all three. Remaining hidden, we’ll expose using the child’s symptoms and the construct of pathogenic parenting. We are going to expose the “psychological fingerprints” of parental control of the child from off of the child’s symptoms. That the “pathogenic parenting” construct.

That’s why a shift to this construct of pathogenic parenting is so important, we are going to use it to “expose that which is hidden” – the psychological control of the child by a parent.

But the allies (defense 2) will try to stop us (defense 3). That’s when we expose who they are. They are the ones attacking (defense 3 of the pathogen).

Now does that mean you can’t attack AB-PA? Heavens no. Attack it all you want. The content of your attacks will reveal whether you have knowledge (no-pathogen) or whether you are ignorant (pathogen).

Are you using Bowlby, Minuchin, Beck, van der Kolk to attack the constructs and principles of AB-PA? Are you using knowledge? Or… are you using ignorance and vacuous arguments no substance (“new theory” – “only way”).

Attack all you want, it is the content of the attack that will expose.

Foundations. I chose the foundations of science.

That’s the foundations we’re standing on. Grounded and established knowledge of professional psychology; Bowlby, Minuchin, Beck, van der Kolk.

Ainsworth, Haley, Madanas, Perry, Bowen, Kernberg, Briere, Linehan, Millon, Courtois, Dark Triad.

Attachment, family systems therapy, personality disorders, complex trauma. The standard and established constructs and principles of professional psychology.

There is no such thing as AB-PA. It is a label for the standard and established knowledge of professional psychology.

No “new theory”… and no “only way” – if you have a solution, woo hoo. Tell us what it is.

Dorcy has an entirely different solution than Dr. Childress. Woo hoo. Let’s do that too. That is a great idea.

If you have a great idea… let’s do that too. The pathogen lies. It lies a lot. It lies all the time.

We are going to expose the pathogen’s lies.

The pathogen says the child rejects you. That’s a lie.

The child loves you and is being manipulated to say and believe things that aren’t true. The pathogen lies. It lies a lot. It lies all the time.

Your children love you. That’s the truth.

The pathogen says you’re emotionally abusive with the child. That’s a lie. You love your child and you’re not “abusive.” The pathogen is using your child as a weapon to inflict revenge and suffering on you for the divorce. Children should never be used as weapons. It is the pathogen that is abusing the child… it lies. It’s the abusive one.

We are going to expose the lies. First it attacks. We absorb the first attack without giving ground. Then we begin to systematically deconstruct the lie. First we capture the lie, then we systematically deconstruct it.

We capture the lie on the attack. Truth is truth, it moves in one direction. A lie, when captured, can be exposed.

Craig Childress, Psy.D.

Clinical Psychologist, PSY 18857