Tag: child Psychological abuse

Things your alienated kids won’t tell you ! / Adult child shares her experience

This really helped me so much today , and I truly consider it a gift .

I emailed it to sons , hoping that this might aide them, as I repeat ..

” I choose to move forward , and will always have one arm pointed

backwards , should positive growth , moving forward, ceasing to target me ,

ends .

youtube.com/watch

A parent recited this parental ‘Contract ‘ – Mind Blowing

Over the past decade, my ex-partner has alienated my twins from me on two occasions, resulting in me losing over three years with them. Throughout this period, I endured numerous court fees, false allegations, and emotional distress. Despite these challenges, I never gave up and ultimately emerged victorious in the final hearing. My teenage sons, who have witnessed the chaos and her narcissistic tendencies firsthand, now desire to live with me. In a surprising turn of events, she has offered to let them live with me. Here is the proposal she has presented…🤣

Done With The Crying: Help and Healing for Mothers of Estranged Adult Children: McGregor M.A., Sheri: 9780997352207: Amazon.com: Books

Done With The Crying: Help and Healing for Mothers of Estranged Adult Children [McGregor M.A., Sheri] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Done With The Crying: Help and Healing for Mothers of Estranged Adult Children
— Read on www.amazon.com/dp/0997352205

Craig Childress – Internet Psychologist

I’m so very glad to have found Craig Childress ; what an education ( since 2013 ) as I learned of the epidemic of family estrangement and Child Psychological Abuse and as deep as I feared .

He’s also Pisces , I think we are the same age so it’s a very authentic soul who stands up for children as his life’s work .

I am very grateful to have been blessed with his being and every second he has spent on his then our edification and offer resolutions 💯❤️🙌

I made it into the office to get some work done.

I’m an Internet psychologist – howdy – the first of my kind out in the wild. There’s a few Internet psychologists still in early development in the lab, but I’m the first to arrive into online clinical practice.

Wheee…. Let’s see what we have here… YouTube? Excellent.

It can be dangerous here unless you know what your doing. I know what I’m doing, that’s why I’m here.

I live in your computer – hi, how ya doin’? I can be in any office anywhere on the planet… which has implications… so I actually don’t need a real-world office like my current office space here on my island because I’m going to use the one where you are.

I’m the second opinion doctor. I’m not the presiding doctor. That’s the one where you are. They have what’s called “duty of care” obligations and they’re licensed in your jurisdiction – for accountability.

I’m a second opinion doctor. I don’t have duty of care obligations. I’m selected for my role as the second opinion doctor because of the specialized expertise that I bring.

I collaborate with the local area professional on the assessment and diagnosis. That’s my role – I’m second opinion consultation as described by the National Academy of Sciences in Improving Diagnosis in Healthcare

From Improving Diagnosis in Healthcare: “Clinicians may refer to or consult with other clinicians (formally or informally) to seek additional expertise about a patient’s health problem. The consult may help to confirm or reject the working diagnosis or may provide information on potential treatment options. If a patient’s health problem is outside a clinician’s area of expertise, he or she can refer the patient to a clinician who holds more suitable expertise. Clinicians can also recommend that the patient seek a second opinion from another clinician to verify their impressions of an uncertain diagnosis or if they believe that this would be helpful to the patient.”

That’s my role. Nobody else does what I do. Nobody else can do what I do. I’ve been evolved by the pathology to a role – the necessary role to cure the pathology.

I’m a doctor. That’s what I do. I cure pathology – I don’t become part of it.

Well now that I’ve made it into the office, I need to get some work done. I’m starting another line-by-line on a mental health report.

An attorney in the matter believes that the application of established knowledge from clinical psychology to a set of information will assist the court in its decision-making surrounding the child.

The attorney has provided me with a set of information for my review. I am beginning the process of applying the established knowledge from clinical psychology to the information… line… by… line.

I will then generate a Summary & Analysis report based on my line-by-line review (which becomes Appendix 1 to my Summary & Analysis report).

Where’s this next one from? Sometimes it’s hard to keep track, they come from anywhere.

I’d estimate 30% of my consults are international and 70% are from the U.S. – Colorado, Florida, and California well ahead of the general pack of states. The other states are more evenly distributed in my practice history.

Something’s happening in Colorado. I have zero idea what it is. But CO had that ProPublica nonsense with Harman and Gottlieb, and Colorado can’t be receiving this much information from me without something happening.

What? Don’t know… don’t want to know. I have a role. I do my role. The outcomes take care of themselves.

Florida too. Florida seems more parent-driven. I don’t want to know what’s happening in Florida either… yet… I want to be brought into situations properly for the Court’s service.

I have two clients – the child and the Court. I’m in the courts as a testifying expert. I need to remain mindful of my role. You take care of you. I’ll take care of me.

You know where I am. I’m here. In your computer. Hi.

When you need me to be in some other computer… I can be there too. Hi.

It’s time we start thinking about setting the odds – which U.S. state will switch paradigms first? I’d put the odds at 60-40 US over Canada (although it might be 60/40 in Canada’s direction – Canada’s curious to predict for reasons).

England’s in the mix as the long-shot dark horse. England’s interesting. They could flip to solutions in a moment… or not. If you want to make excellent money on a reasonable long-shot, England. More rational money though is elsewhere – actually, if you want the bookie’s pick – go small and out of the way.

The odds-on favorite for Europe is Scandinavia – although the domain remains in dispute. Germany has reasonable odds, followed by France, with Spain trailing the Western European realm

My actual money’s not with them. I like more exotic picks with better odds. Eastern Europe. South Africa. Ireland. I’m betting the Field – if any of those countries lead the change to solution… I win.

If anyone else is first to lead… you win. I’ll take the Field of Eastern Europe, South Africa, and Ireland and 10-to-1 odds…

Or I’ll take Canada for the international flipping and you take all of Europe and Asia… and give me 2-to-1 odds – or 60-40 straight up US v. Canada as the first to flip paradigms.

I’ve got incoming work so I need to get work outgoing from me. This incoming is international.

I have an anti-viral program on my computer called the Internet that removes the jet-lag attached to the pdf files.

Well that’s convenient. Hey, did you know about this? Did you know we have the Internet and can be anywhere on the planet?

Sweet.

Craig Childress, Psy.D.

Clinical Psychologist, CA PSY 18857

Remedy – Craig Childress PsyD

My morning coffee thought as I sit with Mr. Pippin:

Today is the last day of my general public consultation, I’m getting emotionally organized for that and then I’m done for July.

And… August is not open – the circus is coming to town and I’ve got tickets to the show – several. I’m taking August off from consultation into the family courts to play at the APA.

I’m presenting on the Contingent Visitation Schedule to the APA through Division 41 Psychology & Law Society. It’s a solution if they want it… but if they want it they must acknowledge I exist.

And if they acknowledge I exist… they take everything else that comes with that. Hmm. Is it a shared persecutory delusion? Yes. Are they misdiagnosing child abuse because they’re practicing beyond the boundaries of their competence? Yes.

Hmm…

I’m an anti-pathogenic agent. When the pathogen encounters me… it dies. So it avoids contact with Dr. Childress at all costs.

But with the C-V-S, I’m not talking to the pathogen infected part of them. I’m talking to the normal part of their brain. It’s intriguing… it’s logical… it will work.

But it takes two things, 1) an accurate diagnosis of the pathology (i.e., a DSM-5 diagnosis of Child Psychological Abuse by the allied parent), and 2) someone to run it.

Them if they want to run it.

Or not if not. It’s up to them if they want it. It’ll solve things. I’ll explain it and they’ll understand. I wonder what they’ll do?

Let’s find out.

I told Division 41 that I’d be teaching how to run a Contingent Visitation Schedule – they said they’d like to hear that. So that’s what I’ll do.

I’ll be teaching them how to run a C-V-S in the family courts. It’s so simple. It’s just a standard behavioral program… except it’s not. It’s more.

It’s crafted by a Strategic family therapist – me – to do things… strategically… in the family to change things that change things to unlock things that are stuck.

I’ll explain it all in a couple of weeks when the circus comes to town – then, once I’ve presented to the APA, I’ll do the same talk to my YouTube channel for everyone everywhere all the time.

Flatlanders… sheesh… catch up you people. We have the Internet now – zoom-zoom. It’s like we invent automobiles and they’re still using horse and buggies – the APA Amish.

Adapt to survive. If you don’t adapt… you don’t survive. Bye-bye forensic custody evaluations. Hello clinical diagnostic assessments for the family courts.

Things are changing – because things need to change.

We are in a time of deep-change, do you feel it? Of course you do, it’s everywhere around us. We are in the Times of Turbulence – whitewater in the flow.

I’ve been preparing for here, for the time of change, not for where we were, the time of insanity.

Where we were was a bad place before. It was insane. I’m not insane, so I prepared for our return to sanity. We’ll return eventually. Dum-dee-dum, I’ll wait.

It’s a shared persecutory delusion and Child Psychological Abuse – DSM-5 V995.51 – and none of them are competent in the diagnostic assessment of delusional thought disorders… in violation of APA ethical standard 2.01 Boundaries of Competence.

How much should I tell them about them when I talk to them directly? I’ll have to be truthful.

Yikes. No sooner do I think that, than I think a truthful thought to say – the universe said “say this” – Yikes. Really?

Okay. Hey courage… truth wants to say something so you’re on call. Sanity, pay attention to what truth wants to say, make sure it passes by you. Cognition keep an eye on emotion, truth has something truth wants to say – emotions… you stay out of it. This has nothing to do with you.

Truth will manage just fine on it’s own. When truth wants to say something, it’s best to just vanish entirely… if it’s sane – sanity, keep an eye on truth and keep me posted.

But that’s not the point of the talk – the point of the talk is to explain the C-V-S… which requires an accurate diagnosis of Child Psychological Abuse – a shared persecutory delusion and FDIA.

Our stroll through the truth of them is just to get to the start of the program… we need a diagnosis – diagnosis guides treatment. When the diagnosis is V995.51 Child Psychological Abuse, the C-V-S is a treatment option for that diagnosis.

Their misdiagnosis is just the assumed start – a momentary acknowledgement of their incompetence – so… let’s begin.

Once we have an accurate diagnosis of Child Psychological Abuse by the allied parent – the the Contingent Visitation Schedule is the treatment response – the remedy.

My talk is about the C-V-S… I should not have to educate them about the pathology. If Dr. Childress needs to educate them about shared persecutory delsuions and FDIA… they are not competent with the pathology by demonstrated ignorance.

Google ignorance: lack of knowledge or information.

And that’s the truth. The truth is your patients should NOT have to educate you about what the pathology is. The truth is that I should NOT have to educate you about what the pathology is.

The truth is you should already know – and should have known this entire time. You should not need to be educated… but, oh my gosh… you do.

Or do you? Do you know it’s a shared persecutory delusion?

Or do you believe a shared delusion as if it was true. If you believe a shared delusion… you become part of the shared delusion and you, the forensic psychologist, become part of the pathology (because you are practicing beyond the boundaries of your competence with delusional thought disorders).

If either your patients or Dr. Childress has to educate you about shared (induced) persecutory delusions and false (factitious) attachment pathology imposed on the child… then you are not competent with the pathology by demonstrated need to be educated – in violation of Standard 2.01 of the APA ethics code.

So… to continue, assuming you have returned a DSM-5 diagnosis of Child Psychological Abuse for the allied narcissistic-borderline-dark personalty parent, the child is then protectively separated from the abusive allied parent pursuant to duty to protect obligations, and the child’s healthy development is recovered in therapy with the court-involved DBT family therapist.

Right? Or do I need to educate you about child abuse safety plans and child abuse treatment too? I’m not going to, I’m here to educate you about how to run a Contingent Visitation Schedule, not to educate you about things you should already know – Standard 2.01.

So… to continue, once the child’s healthy development is stabilized, contact with the abusive parent is restored with enough safeguards in place to ensure the abuse does not resume when contact is reestablished. That’s what we do for all forms of child abuse.

The Contingent Visitation Schedule is that safeguard to make sure the abuse does not resume once the child abuse has been properly diagnosed (identified). The C-V-S requires court authorization to flex the custody schedule based on child symptoms.

The C-V-S does things to the family dynamics that changes things to alter rewards (called secondary gain) which alters motivations.

I’ll explain it all Saturday morning at 9:00am in Seattle in a couple of weeks. I’m going to walk to the convention… because I can. Holy cow, it’s such a weird world.

I’ll send you a snapshot on the day-of as the fairies bring me back to your world from mine. This’ll be fun.

I’m planning to do a remote broadcast from the APA with Melanie like a new-world YouTube influencer person. I have a friend who knows a guy who has a buddy who knows about that sort of stuff.

I think that’d be fun – surfing Facebook Live at the APA – cowabunga baby.

I finish my July monthly week of family court triage. I’m not triaging the family court devastation in August because the APA is coming to town and I’ll be busy entertaining all my APA friends from out-of-town.

I’ll start doing general public consults again in September. Things are getting busy – my things. It’s the Time of Turbulence – whitewater. Holy cow, here we go. Find the flow or you’ll be in trouble.

Wheee…

I have to run off now for my day of monthly weekly consultion to the pathology in the family courts. Time to get off Mr. Pippin.

Let me leave you with this tid-bit of understanding.

Did you know it’s an ethical violation of the mandatory APA ethics code to practice beyond the boundaries of your competence? It is, Standard 2.01.

Did you know that I am a walking accusation of unethical malpractice to every forensic psychologist I meet… simply because I exist. I don’t even need to say anything… in fact, it’s better if I don’t.

My mere existence is the accusation because… I’m competent and they’re not – and they know it – and I know it. It’s an unspoken understanding. My mere existence is the accusation… along with… the body of my professional work.

Which they are aware of, right? Standard 2.03 Maintaining Competence of the mandatory required APA ethics code. You’re not unethical are you? Of course not. So I shouldn’t have to explain to you what the pathology is or your troubling history of misdiagnosis…. right?

I do not need to say a word. I’m the floor, not the ceiling, but they’re looking up at the floor… because they’re in the basement of professional practice – below ground level.

We need standards of practice. Let’s start with the APA ethics code and the DSM-5. Let’s start there as the floor. Hey, forensic psychologists, get out of the basement and at least practice at the level of the APA ethics code and using the DSM-5 for diagnosis.

Gotta run. Things to do. Mr. Pippin says I’ve got other things to do than talk to you, and he’s right,

Craig Childress, Psy.D.

Clinical Psychologist, CA PSY 18857