Craig Childress , PsyD

In my studies , I accepted reincarnation, and given that concept , our previous lives are not remembered , perhaps a nuance , that we don’t understand . So , in that I chose the life experiences and teachings/lessons . A psychic ( now in Malibu , Ca) stated that most folks choose 7 missions or jobs in a life span and that my personal blueprint was quite expansive with 18 missions ! I was blown away at the type A decision that in my people pleasing days , drove me and nearly took me out of here .

Reading the following by Craig Childress PsyD , of having no free will thus would be accurate, given the personal Divine Plans created before entering the present life .

I totally accept that in past lives I was both male and female and in those roles I was murdered and I killed and I requested the lessons and teachers who would help in my evolution.

Determined. Sapolsky.

He’s a very smart fellow, and he is 100% right. Everything is determined, there is no such thing as “free will”.

Sam Harris understand that too. He’s another smart fell who’s 100% right. There’s no room in causality for a ghost in the machine’s operation.

Everything is fixed by what came before, what surrounds, and what is possible in that context.

You didn’t choose your time of birth. You didn’t choose to not be born in the World War II years, or in Victorian England, or in Roman times. You just showed up and took whatever here has…. just like me.

We didn’t choose our parents who had such substantial impact on us. We didn’t choose how we look or how smart or athletic we are. We didn’t choose to be born in America, or India, or Africa. We just showed up and began to cope.

Some came into better worlds, some worse.

The Georgia school shooter had no choice. It was all Determined by a variety of factors. He was set on a course that ends in a cage.

He obviously has a problem in the love-and-bonding system of the brain – the attachment system. It’s a motivational system. It’s my system, I have zero-to-five Early Childhood Mental Health specialization.

The boys mind was not getting enough love. That unhinged it from our shared social field. Why didn’t his mind get love?

As a male, his high-affection cross-gender bond is to his mother, which is also the primary attachment bond in the first year of infancy. What’s up with his mother-son bond?

His dad’s on the same-gender father-son values and identify bond. He bought his son an assault rifle at 14 for a present. The father obviously did not teach his son the values needed to manage the gift of violence he gave him.

In a different context, in a different time and history, this child does not end his life in sadistic violence of self-destruction. He has a mind of substantially insufficient love.

It made him crazy, in a particular way, in a savagely violent way. What was it like inside the child’s mind to reach this point? It didn’t just arrive suddenly at the age of 14.

The child’s act was Determined by what happened one-minute earlier, one hour earlier, one day earlier, a culture earlier, a history earlier. He just did what he did from the ripples that defined him.

We can stop it.

We can stop it when there is the motivation to stop it. There’s no motivation because it serves a function for you-us. We reenact things in our drama-story of our imaginings. We want it this way, we need it this way.

Until we don’t. Once we don’t want this… we’ll do different things that won’t result in this. How do we change when everything is Determined?

Be the change.

It’s not about you or me. It ceased to be about us a long-long time ago. Living things grow. Children grow. Children are living things. Adults are fully grown. We’re dead carcasses hanging on for a purpose.

To take care of the life within us – our children – not us.

Our life is not in us, it’s in our children. Once we understand that we’ll reorient. Once we reorient we’ll see the problem and see its solution.

The solution is in our children. They are on the Hero’s Journey to encounter their freedom in an unfree world.

For 200,000 years we chipped stone tools. Suddenly 10,000 years ago we decided to live in cities of Ur and grow our plants and animals for our meals.

We began a journey called History. A linear journey.

Before, we lived in the seasons, a repeating circle of life from spring, through summer, into fall and winter… then spring again. Time was a circle of same… 200,000 years of chipping the same stone tools.

Suddenly, 10,000 years ago we started to fire mud into pottery, and we began to super-heat rocks to extract liquid metals. What happened to us?

We began a linear journey through History. Our History to here is fully told. It’s already set – it’s already Determined. There was no other path to here than the one that led to specifically here.

A 14-year-old child of ours savagely took the lives of two other children, two teachers… and himself.

He had no other choice given the context of time and place where no love was. He spoke to us of his world.

A world without love.

Craig Childress, Psy.D.

Clinical Psychologist, CA PSY 18857

Another professional to aide in getting our kids back – Craig Childress Psy D

New Resource

Dr. Price-Tobler walks her graduation today in Australia. Or maybe it was yesterday, I get confused with Australia. It’s now. I’m attending. Sort of. She sent me the Zoom-link. I love the Internet.

Dr. Price-Tobler has also written a book from her dissertation research regarding the now-adult survivors of childhood psychological abuse. It’s being sent off to the publishers.

I wrote the Foreward for Dr. Price-Tobler’s upcoming book. Wanna hear my Foreward?

I have had the pleasure of knowing Dr. Price-Tobler professionally for many years, and I personally know her to be a dedicated clinician to the substantial benefit of her clients. Dr. Price-Tobler has a broader 38 year professional background in adolescents and adults with severe emotional and psychological disabilities affecting their lives, while also maintaining a more focused practice with the now-adult survivors of severe level child psychological abuse by a pathological parent.

The research and clinical work of Dr. Price-Tobler with adolescents and families in high-conflict custody litigation is superior ground-breaking research in a much-needed area, child psychological abuse prevention and recovery. The child abuse pathology in the family courts has gone unrecognised and neglected for 40 years of forensic psychology, as is typical for all forms of child abuse prior to its overt recognition. Child abuse is always a neglected and hidden pathology, until it is recognised. Once child abuse is seen, we protect the child. Until the child abuse is recognised, children are abused and remain unprotected.

The failure of professional psychology for the past 40 years in misdiagnosing (misidentifying) the pathology in the family courts as being something other than child abuse has led to generations of abused and untreated children, who now, as adults, struggle with a variety of life issues as a result of their undiagnosed and untreated psychological abuse as a child. It is to these now-adult survivors of child psychological abuse that Dr. Price-Tobler brings her research efforts to understanding their needs, toward a goal of developing a treatment protocol for the recovery of healthy development with the now-adult survivors.

Dr. Price-Tobler brings accomplished professional insights to her own personal experience as a now-adult survivor of severe level psychological child abuse and abduction in her own childhood history. The life course that Dr. Price-Tobler took to her current professional accomplishments is a testament to the resilience of now-adult children of psychological abuse in overcoming both the psychological abuse of childhood and the neglect from the professional community regarding their damaged attachment beliefs.

Dr. Price-Tobler’s research provides a valuable first step to understanding the unique experience of the now-adult survivors of abuse by a narcissistic-borderline-dark personality parent. This ground-breaking research provides novel and valuable insights into the current experiences of now-adult survivors and potential insights into possible differing strains of the pathology’s severity and expression.

In particular, Dr. Price-Tobler brings potential directions for more deeply understanding the psychological damage to children caused by child abduction surrounding divorce and child custody conflict. Creating severe attachment pathology (psychotic-range) in the child for secondary gain of manipulating the court’s decisions regarding child custody creates significant psychological damage in the child (from an induced persecutory delusion and factitious attachment pathology imposed on the child). The additional complex trauma of child abduction, however, adds an entirely new layer of trauma and psychological child abuse that the current research by Dr. Price-Tobler begins to examine.

The professional, academic scholarship of Dr. Price-Tobler is exceptional and is a credit to her mental health practitioner training, her lived experience, and her dedication to the well-being of her clients. The quality of scholarship from Dr. Price-Tobler clearly indicates her dedication to well-serve her clients and is a credit to the profession.

I anticipate with eagerness the upcoming Volume Two of her twin PhD study pertaining to the mental health practitioners who work therapeutically with now adult survivors, and additional work from Dr. Price-Tobler.

Regards, Dr Craig Childress.

A new Player has entered the game. She’s not here for you. She’s here for the forgotten who’ve become lost. She’s going to find them to bring them back home.

Craig Childress, Psy.D.

Clinical Psychologist, CA PSY 18857

Empowered to move forward – Craig Childress , Psy D

The pathogen isolated you from rescue by creating forensic psychologists – a sub-specialty field… just for you.

No other pathology has their own “special” psychologists who do something different, who don’t diagnose and don’t treat pathology. Let that sink in… they don’t identify the problem or fix it.

What good are they? A: None.

The pathogen gave you bait to seduce you into squandering your efforts and energy in useless fighting and fighting that never solves anything… by giving you the WORST possible diagnostic model for a proposed “new pathology” unique in all mental health of “parental alienation”.

The pathology created forensic psychology to isolate parents from rescue. The pathology created the construct of “parental alienation” as bait for parents to exhaust your efforts into unproductive fighting.

Wait… Dr. Childress, are you saying a pathology has motivation? Yes. No other pathology seeks to be the pathology. ADHD doesn’t want to be ADHD, schizophrenia is not trying to remain schizophrenic. This pathology is seeking to exist – it needs to exist – it has motivation.

How? Because the pathology is an attachment pathology. The attachment system is a primary motivational system of the brain. The coherent set of damaged information structures in the attachment networks, damaged by trauma that remains unresolved, have access to our motivations.

The pathogen can make us do things we don’t realize we’re doing.

The pathogen has three defenses. No other pathology has defenses seeking to maintain the pathology against its resolution. This pathology does, it defends itself, it wants to exist, it needs to exist.

1) Hide. This pathogen’s first defense is to hide. It hides extremely well.

2) Seek Allies. This pathogen seeks allies who will enable it to exist (and remain hidden).

3) Attack Threats of Exposure. This pathogen attacks any threats of exposure with great viciousness to put target on the defensive.

I’ve fixed that. I’ve exposed the pathogen from hiding – diagnosis – I’ve identified in professional-level constructs what the pathology is.

I’ve identified its allies in the forensic psychologists and Gardnerian PAS “experts” – it’s not enough to simply identify the pathology, we must also identify the pathogen’s allies who enable it. Without its allies, the pathogen becomes powerless.

I’ve endured its attack… and I’m still standing. It’s our turn now to attack the pathogen and put the pathogen on the defensive. The moment it has to defend… it’s exposed from its hiding.

The pathogen is exposed on attack. I’ve created a situation where it MUST attack or else it will be identified and removed. I’ve created a double-bind for it, if it doesn’t attack Dr. Childress, I will be expose it, and if it attacks… it will expose itself.

It’s a pathogen – a coherent set of damaged information structures in the brain that cause a pattern of pathology. See the patterns and you’ll see the pathogen that creates them.

The pathogen’s only choice now is to avoid encountering the anti-pathogen of Dr. Childress and my work. It doesn’t even want to acknowledge I exist, because the moment it does… it’s all over, it’s exposed from its hiding and everyone sees it.

But it will be unable to avoid the encounter with Dr. Childress and the anti-pathogen of AB-PA because I’m already into the mind-scape. Truth is truth. Truth will out.

I’m not your warrior, I’m your weapon. I replaced your impotent “parental alienation” thing with something effective, something powerful – diagnosis and the established knowledge.

I’ve made you dangerous to the allies of the pathogen. Knowledge is immensely dangerous to ignorance, especially when the binding sites of ignorance are required – required – by ethical standards to apply knowledge as the bases for professional judgments.

I’ve boxed it in. It has no escape now. Forensic psychology will collapse and “parental alienation” will disappear from professional-level use. Clinical psychology has abandoned you – because the pathogen has made itself too dangerous to your allies to be here.

The pathogen isolated you from rescue. That’s our next step, we need to get you quality professional services in the family courts, competent mental health services for you and your children, and an accurate diagnosis for the court’s decisions surrounding the child and family.

When I found you, you were all going round-n-round in endless circles of continual conflict. I put us on a linear path. We are moving in a direction. We have reached the point of collapse, the Tower of Destruction that lead to rebirth.

The dysfuntional systems are collapsing into their dysfunction. For the Phoenix to rise from the ashes, there must be ashes.

I needed to have everything completed by the time the Dying Time came in 2020, the Sacrifice needed for entry. I was on the list of those to be sacrificed, it was coming for the old, it was a culling of the herd of the old and vulnerable, I was part of the herd it was culling.

I didn’t know if the coming sacrifice represented by the Dying Time was for you or included me. It was yours, I was able to successfully dance with invisible death and I survived.

But going in, I didn’t know if I’d be coming out, so I had to have everything completed by the time the Dying Time of the sacrifice arrived.

Now everything is done. You have everything you need. Plus I’m still here for a while to help with your transitions, at least for as long as I’m here. I dodged death in 2020, but the doorway remains just up ahead. It’s the way of things to transition out so others can transition in.

I’ve done my job. Now they need to do theirs. You are more powerful than you know.

You’re the protective parent. I know that and you know that.You just need support. You have support. It’s time to live into your power.

Craig Childress, Psy.D.
Clinical Psychologist, CA PSY 18857

Types of Flying Monkeys: The 2 Main Kinds of Narcissistic Enablers

Forward by Craig Childress , Psy D

Flying Monkeys & Social Distribution

The pathology in the family courts has many interesting and unique features. For one thing, the pathogen has motivation, it wants to create itself.

No other pathology has motivation to be the pathology. The autistic child doesn’t want to be autistic, ADHD doesn’t fight to remain ADHD, the person can’t help but produce the symptoms of the problem they’re having.

With this pathology, however, the pathology of the narcissistic-borderline-dark personality parent NEEDS to create the pathology in the child in order to create a false narrative – the trauma reenactment narrative – of a supposedly “abusive” targeted parent, the supposedly “victimized” child, and the supposedly “protective” allied parent.

But it’s all a false narrative created by the pathology in the narcissistic-borderline-dark personality parent, and it meets diagnostic criteria for both a shared persecutory delusion and a factitious (false) attachment pathology imposed on the child (FDIA).

Google factitious: artificially created or developed.

This is a false pathology. This is a pathology of lies.

If we try to alter what the pathological parents is seeking to do, i.e., if we try to change the false attachment pathology and promote bonding of the child to the targeted parent, the allied parent (and psychologically controlled child) will fight AGAINST treatment, seeking to keep the child’s pathology in place.

No other pathology (problem) fights AGAINST being solved, no other pathology wants to be the pathology. This pathology does.

As you examine in closer detail this unique and interesting motivational feature of this specific pathology, you’ll discover it’s because it’s ultimately an attachment trauma pathology that has crystallized into the personality disorder pathology of the parent – now being transferred to the child – the trans-generational transmission of attachment trauma.

The attachment system is a primary motivational system of the brain. Because this pathology is an attachment-trauma pathology, the damaged information structures in the person’s attachment networks (the pathogen) has access to the person’s motivational networks – it is a motivational pathology, a problem in the motivations for love-and-bonding (the attachment system).

Eating disorders also have this motivational feature, i.e., the motivation to remain eating disorders. Eating disorders are a pathology (problem) in another primary motivational system of the brain, the eating system. Eating disorders are a motivational pathology as well, just to a different primary motivational system.

The attachment system is a primary motivational system of the brain, the love-and-bonding motivational system. A child rejecting a parent is a problem in attachment bonding, it’s a motivational pathology surrounding love-and-bonding.

The pathology in the family courts has another unique and interesting feature – it’s shared between multiple people. It’s a shared delusional pathology. There’s no shared ADHD or shared autism, there’s not even a shared eating disorder – all the other pathologies are individual, the attachment system though, is a ‘shared’ relationship system.

Interestingly, it’s not simply shared between the pathological parent and the child. Once the false trauma reenactment narrative is established, other minds with the unresolved trauma seek to bond into the false narrative in the role of the “protective” other (in parallel to the pathological parent’s role as the “protective” parent).

These pathological people – extended family, mental health professionals, and random people – then become allies of the pathology in enacting the false narrative. In trauma-work this is called the “bystander” role.

There are four roles in child abuse: abusive parent, victimized child, protective parent, bystander.

The pathological bystanders attach as supposedly “protective” others to the false trauma reenactment narrative created by the pathological parent in order to work-through the unresolved attachment trauma of the bystander person.

In psychoanalytic terms, this is called their “counter-transference”.

This pathology seeks allies. No other pathology seeks and acquires allies who work to create and maintain the pathology. This pathology has a social distribution feature – it spreads from brain to brain and creates a shared thought disorder, a shared delusion.

Another important feature of this particular pathology is that it’s the abuse pathology – narcissistic personality pathology is the abuse pathology; child abuse and spousal abuse. It’s from the absence of empathy characteristic of the narcissistic personality. The absence of empathy is the capacity for cruelty (Baron-Cohen).

This pathology is immensely dangerous. This is the most dangerous pathogen on the planet – narcissistic-borderline-dark personalities are extremely dangerous people if you try to stop what they need to do – if you try to interfere with what their damaged motivational networks are requiring them to do.

If you try to stop the pathology of the narcissistic-borderline-dark personality human… they will attack you with great viciousness.

We can see all of these features displayed in the social surround in parallel process – same pathology. This isn’t politics, it’s pathology. I’m using the pathology’s display in the social surround to educate (those who can see) in the features of the pathology.

If you have the eyes to see, it can be helpful to understanding to see the pathology’s multiple features writ large across the public display.

There are allies like Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, Kevin McCarthy, and Fox who work to enable the pathology to be enacted. Without their support, the Big Lie (the false narrative of persecution) would not exist and survive.

Then there’s another layer of ally. These are the dangerous stray humans who attach to the false narrative for their own darkly malevolent and sadistic purposes. These are the Proud Boys spectrum of allies – these are the SA of Nazi Germany – these are the flying monkey spectrum of allies.

They swarm around and abuse anyone who is trying to alter the enactment of the pathology. They seek to destroy the person professionally and personally through slander, false allegations, and lies.

I first encountered the flying monkey phenomenon surrounding Dorcy Pruter. The pathology and its flying monkey allies have been inflicting abuse on Dorcy for year-and-years. She’s been abused with slander, hostility, and lies her entire time in the family courts because she successfully fixes the breached attachment bond.

The pathogen hates Dorcy… for a reason. She sees it. She fixes it.

Despite all the abuse Dorcy’s endured for the sake of the children and their parents, she’s still standing, which says a lot about the quality of person she is – and – she’s not only still standing, she’s successful.

Stupid pathogen.

When I first recognized that Dorcy had the solution in her hip-pocket with the High Road workshop, and the extent of the flying monkey abuse she endured as a result, I tried to give her all the professional protection I could from my degree-status.

If the flying monkeys wanted to destroy her, they had to get through Dr. Childress first, that provided some layer of protection, but not nearly enough. No one should have to endure the abuse that the professionals seeking to solve the pathology in the family courts have to endure.

We know what the pathology is. We know about flying monkeys. We know that narcissistic-borderline-dark personality pathology is the most dangerous pathology on the planet. We need the APA to get over here. Clinical psychology needs to return to court-involved custody conflict.

But they won’t come, they will refuse because it is too dangerous to their licenses, and after 40 years of being absent from the family courts, none of the clinical psychologists are competent in this court involved factitious attachment and delusional thought disorder pathology created by a narcissistic-borderline-dark personality parent.

With this pathology, it’s not enough to simply identify the pathology, we must also identify – by name – its allies who are supporting and enabling the pathology to exist. The doctors need to be doctors and clearly identify (diagnose) the child abuse and spousal abuse involved… and the doctors will need protection from retaliation.

How do we protect the doctors? Professional psychology tried an experiment with you, they gave you your own “sub-discipline” of psychologists called “forensic” psychologists and then gave them authority to do whatever they wanted to protect themselves.

The forensic psychologists protect themselves from retaliation by exempting themselves from all ethical standards of practice and accountability. The forensic psychologists are allowed by licensing boards to self-review their own… and they all do the same thing.

They cover-up for the unethical malpractice of other forensic psychologists… because they all do the same thing. The licensing boards are corrupted by the influence of the forensic psychologists. How do you think things got so bad here?

No oversight – no meaningful scrutiny (NY Blue Ribbon Commission on Forensic Custody Evaluations).

It’s a mess, and it’s immensely dangerous for any clinical psychologist – or anyone – to try to help you. We need to substantially elevate the standards of practice for psychologists practicing in the family courts – and we need to protect them.

How do we protect them? We need an agreed upon diagnostic assessment and treatment protocol of the highest caliber that accurately diagnoses the pathology for treatment and the court.

This is active child a abuse – DSM-5 V995.51 Child Psychological Abuse. This is active spousal abuse using the child as the weapon – DSM-5 V995.82 Spouse or Partner Abuse, Psychological. The doctors need to return an accurate diagnosis 100% of the time so we can protect the children and their parents.

We have obligations.

How do the psychologists protect themselves? By making an accurate and supported diagnosis that can be verified by second-opinion. We should be generating second opinion (or even third opinion) consultations are all child abuse diagnoses returned in the family courts.

We have the Internet – tele-health consultation is easily available. We, the psychologists, need to go in as pairs. Consultation always improves the quality of healthcare services received.

This is the most dangerous pathogen on the planet. It’s in the family courts. It is cruel and abusive – it is narcissistic, psychopathic, manipulative, delusional, retaliatory, and sadistic…

…and it is currently undiagnosed and untreated.

We need focused attention paid to the family courts from professional psychology – from the APA – we have obligations. We are failing our obligations to the court, to the parents, and to the children.

Children, parents, and professionals are being abused daily surrounding the pathology in the family courts, and it is not being addressed. This is active child abuse. This is active spousal abuse. This is active professional abuse.

And no one is stopping it… yet.

Accountability is coming for the enabling allies. Many of the Jan 6 flying monkeys have been sentenced to jail. We need accountability in the family courts – we need to hold the forensic psychologists accountable for their unethical malpractice, and clinical psychology accountable for their abandonment of these children and parents.

We need to fix things. We can do that, we just need the motivation. This is a motivational pathology.

Craig Childress, Psy.D.

Clinical Psychologist, CA PSY 18857

A flying monkey is someone who enables a narcissists campaign of abuse. Here are the two main types of flying monkey and how to spot them.
— Read on www.narcissisticabuserehab.com/types-of-flying-monkeys/

Childress , Psy D – Reporting Ethical Violations

I’ll be back… live on Facebook Live on Sunday at 8:00 Pacific. Who knows what I’ll talk about.

I may talk about the Mariners, or Neil Young, or maybe I’ll talk about your situation in the family courts, who knows, it’s Live.

Live from Seattle, it’s Sunday Childress.

Next week, you’ll get another series of fireside chats, I’m going to muse and old-man ramble on my experiences with the AFCC.

In 2017 I went to the national convention of the AFCC to tell them one thing – you are in violation of Standards 2.01 and 2.04 of the APA ethics code. To do that, I started by explaining the pathology to them using the “established scientific and professional knowledge of the discipline – which then activates Standards 2.01 and 2.04 requiring they know these domains of knowledge.

I went to the AFCC national convention to discharge my – required – ethical obligations under Standard 1.05 of the APA ethics code.

1.05 Reporting Ethical Violations
If an apparent ethical violation has substantially harmed or is likely to substantially harm a person or organization and is not appropriate for informal resolution under Standard 1.04, Informal Resolution of Ethical Violations , or is not resolved properly in that fashion, psychologists take further action appropriate to the situation. Such action might include referral to state or national committees on professional ethics, to state licensing boards, or to the appropriate institutional authorities.

There has been harm and the risk of ongoing harm from the unethical practice by other psychologists, so that criteria is met for the applicability of Standard 1.05, and Standard 1.04 Informal Notification of all of forensic psychology is not applicable… so Standard 1.05 is applicable – mandatory – required.

I need to take “further action appropriate to the situation.”

What is that? Standard 1.05 offers some suggested examples to guide the answer to that question – I should notify “state or national committees on professional ethics, to state licensing boards, or to the appropriate institutional authorities.”

As the professional organization for forensic psychologists in the family courts, notifying the institutional authority who is responsible for generating the Model Standards of Practice for Child Custody Evaluation, the AFCC, would be the appropriate institutional authority for me to notify.

AFCC Guidelines for Forensic Custody Evaluations
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiRxPX70KKAAxWlMjQIHfzeD70QFnoECA4QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.afccnet.org%2FPortals%2F0%2FCommittees%2FModelStdsChildCustodyEvalSept2006.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3oh0h5xNw6DkMnOC-Gi4rn&opi=89978449

When you take responsibility for proposing guidelines, you also take responsibility for the consequences of following those guidelines.

To discharge my – mandatory – ethical obligations imposed by Standard 1.05 of the APA ethics code, I formally notified the AFCC – with documentation from my Powerpoint of exactly what I told them – of the ethical violations; Standards 2.01 & 2.04.

First, I educated them on the established knowledge because they are ignorant like a rock – I had to educate them before I could have a professional-level discussion with them. Then in four specific slides – I notified the AFCC of the specific ethical violations to competence.

I fulfilled my ethical obligation. It’s been six years, have they fulfilled theirs – Standards 2.01 Boundaries of Competence – Standard 2.04 Bases for Scientific and Professional Judgments – Standard 2.03 Maintaining Competence?

I also took Dorcy Pruter with me. I didn’t have to do that. She was not directly relevant to my accusations of ethical violations by the forensic psychologists. But as long as I was going to Mordor to destroy their ring of power, I might as well introduce them – and all of professional psychology in the family courts, including clinical psychology when they return – to Dorcy Pruter, CEO of the Conscious Co-Parenting Institute.

Dorcy is a businesswoman and family coach with over 10 years of experience solving the pathology in the family courts. I felt it was my ethical obligation to introduce professional psychology to the remarkable Ms. Puter – who has the solution, the High Road workshop, in her hip pocket.

“Hey, forensic psychology, have you met Ms. Pruter? She has a 4-day workshop that fixes the pathology. Do you want to know how she does it? Okay, we’ll explain it to you” – documented on a specific set of slides presented to the national convention of the AFCC.

We explained to them what Dorcy does, and how she achieves her success in a full recovery of the child… in just four days.

Dorcy told them what she does, then I provided a translation from her common sense into professional-speak. Then Dorcy would tell them the next thing she does, and I provided a translation from her common sense into professional-speak – documented by the Powerpoint slides we presented.

So… you’d think the AFCC would like receiving this information regarding established knowledge and solutions. Do you know what they did in response?

They removed the Continuing Education units from all the participants who attended because of a post-convention campaign of lies and harassment led by Jean Mercer… who documents exactly what she did on her blog – crowing about how she got the AFCC to remove the CE units for the Childress & Pruter seminar.

Holy cow… Jean Mercer is so intellectually.challenged that I don’t even have to document her into the record… she documents herself. Oh my gosh, that’s just so… unusual.

I have to be careful about what I say. Did you know one time Jean Mercer filed a licensing board complaint against me in California for unprofessional practice (I said in a blog that she was not a “real psychologist” because she’s never been licensed to assess, diagnose, or treat any pathology), and then she tried to use this board complaint (that she made) in testimony to the court to slander my professional reputation (without informing the court that it was Jean Mercer who made the complaint) – it was dismissed once I explained things to the California Board of Psychology.

Holy cow… the Adventures of a Clinical Psychologist in Wonderland. There’s an entire menagerie of characters over here – there’s the Walrus and the Carpenter over there manipulating and feasting on the oysters – there are hookah smoking caterpillars – and the Mad Hatter runs a continual tea party with his friends.

And I have documentation. Am I Alice or Lewis Carrol?

Do you want to hear a story? I have so many interesting stories. Like the time I presented with Dorcy to the AFCC.

Did you know I presented with Dorcy again in 2019, this time to the national convention of the APA. That’s another interesting story – for some other time.

Next week, you’ll hear about the time Dr. Childress & Dorcy Pruter presented to the AFCC national convention.

Then I’ll be back on Sunday for another Facebook Live – then I’ll tell you more stories from the Adventures of a Clinical Psychologist in Wonderland of the Family Courts.

It just keeps getting curiouser and curiouser.

Craig Childress, Psy.D.
Clinical Psychologist, CA PSY 18857

Dr. Craig Childress: Attachment Based “Parental Alienation” (AB-PA) – A Scientifically Based Model of “Parental Alienation”

A Scientifically Based Model of “Parental Alienation”
— Read on drcraigchildressblog.com/