The Retaliation of #47

Trump Promised Retribution. Turns Out He Had a Very Big Target in Mind

March 5, 2025

The New York Times

By Jamelle Bouie

Opinion Columnist

Donald Trump rambled, ranted and raved his way through the 2024 presidential campaign, but he was clear on one point. When he was elected, he would get revenge.

“I am your retribution,” Trump said to crowds of his supporters throughout the campaign.

This was not an abstraction. He had a few targets in mind.

“I will appoint a real special prosecutor to go after the most corrupt president in the history of the United States of America, Joe Biden, and the entire Biden crime family,” he said in 2023.

There were also the judges, prosecutors and politicians who tried to hold Trump accountable for his crimes, both the ones for which he was indicted and the ones for which he was convicted. He refused to rule out an effort to prosecute Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney who prosecuted the Stormy Daniels hush-money case against him, and attacked Justice Juan Merchan, who presided over the trial, as “crooked.” Trump shared an image that called for the former Republican representative and Jan. 6 committee member Liz Cheney to be prosecuted in “televised military tribunals,” and he accused Gen. Mark Milley, a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, of treason, calling his actions “so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH!”

To get his revenge, Trump would turn the I.R.S., the F.B.I. and other powerful parts of the federal government against his political enemies. He would hound and harass them in retaliation for their opposition to his law stretching and lawbreaking.

For once in his public career, Trump wasn’t lying. As president, he has made it a priority to go after his political enemies.

One of his first acts once he was back in office was to remove security protections from former officials facing credible death threats, including his former secretary of state Mike Pompeo and his former national security adviser John Bolton, both of whom Trump views as disloyal. Not only did he take away their protection, knowing they were under threat from Iran, but he also publicly discussed that he had removed their security, as if to entice their antagonists.

Trump fired more than a dozen government inspectors general at various federal agencies — most likely in retaliation for the fact that it was an inspector general who informed Congress about Trump’s attempt to pressure Ukraine to investigate Biden. Trump has also tried to purge the Justice Department of any lawyers and officials who worked on the Jan. 6 investigation or helped to prosecute the Jan. 6 rioters (nearly all of whom, of course, he pardoned or released).

Trump has also placed a supplicant, Kash Patel, at the head of the F.B.I. A fervent Trump loyalist, Patel has promised to “go out and find the conspirators” who undermined Trump in office. Patel even published an enemies list of people he hoped to pursue and prosecute in a second Trump term, with names ranging from Democrats like Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris to former Trump allies like Bill Barr and Cassidy Hutchinson. Now that Patel is ensconced at the F.B.I., we should expect him to wield his new powers against the president’s foes, whether in government or outside it.

You can even understand Trump’s deep hostility toward Ukraine and its president, Volodymyr Zelensky, as part of his effort to punish anyone who undermines his attempt to gather and wield power. It is noteworthy that after his disastrous Oval Office confrontation with the Ukrainian president, Trump voiced his sympathy for the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, in a novel and revealing way. “Let me tell you: Putin went through a hell of a lot with me,” Trump said. “He went through a phony witch hunt where they used him and Russia.” He seems to identify so closely with Putin that he sees any scrutiny of the Russian dictator as an attack on him as well.

Altogether, Trump has done more to actualize his desire for retribution than he has to fulfill his campaign promise to lower the price of groceries or reduce the cost of housing. A telling sign, perhaps, of his real priorities in office.

Know someone who would want to read this? Share the column.

This fact of Trump’s indifference to most Americans — if not his outright hostility toward them, considering his assault on virtually every government function that helps ordinary people — suggests another dimension to his revenge tour. It is almost as if he wants to inflict pain not just on a specific set of individuals but on the entire nation.

Here, it is worth taking a minute here to talk about the psychology of Donald Trump.

Some of our presidents have been complicated men. Consider Richard Nixon, a nearly Shakespearean figure of great talent and ambition whose paranoia, personal demons and lust for power proved to be his downfall.

Trump, by comparison, is not a complicated man.

His every executive function exists to satisfy his ego. He is a covetous person consumed by an insatiable desire for acquisition, a man who seems to take the seven deadly sins as a seven-day challenge. He sees every relationship as a game of dominance and seems to reject the very idea of a mutually beneficial transaction. He treats everyone around him, from employees and political allies to members of his own family, as tools to use and then discard. To cozy up to Trump is to sacrifice your dignity to his cravings and desires.

Understand these basic traits about Trump — and there is not much more to understand — and you can all but predict his behavior in any given situation. Yes, he is erratic, volatile, capricious and compulsive. But the common conceit that he is unpredictable is belied by the ease with which even a casual observer can plot his movements from A to B.

For example, Trump will always reject the results and present himself as a winner if he loses a contest. This was clear in 2016 — he even claimed that Clinton’s popular-vote victory was the result of fraud — and it came to fruition when he lost re-election in 2020, a psychic wound so grievous that the only way he could attend to it was to try to overturn the result.

Trump failed — and spent the next four years stewing over his defeat. He made “Stop the steal” his mantra and organized the entire Republican Party around the delusional claim that he was the legitimate victor in 2020. And while Trump went on to win the 2024 race, even capturing the national popular vote for the first time in his political career, it’s not at all clear that his rage and resentment have subsided. It would actually be shocking, given what we know about his behavior and personality, if he could regulate his emotions well enough to turn his anger into something more constructive.

If this is his psychological state, then it stands to reason that Trump would want revenge against the public that denied him a second term as much as he wants revenge against the officials who have tried to make him answer for his illegal actions.

It is hard to describe Trump’s first month and a half in office as something other than a retribution campaign against the American people.

Under the cover of an audit, he has empowered Elon Musk, his de facto co-president, to take an ax to any and every program that helps ordinary Americans. The so-called Department of Government Efficiency has stripped funds or personnel or both from the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the National Park Service, the National Weather Service, FEMA, the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration, among others. It has degraded the federal government’s ability to deliver critical services to tens of millions of Americans and is endangering direct payments to millions more. There is no apparent rhyme or reason to these cuts, only a nihilistic drive to cause as much damage and to make it as irreparable as possible.

One immediate response to all of this is to say that Trump is operating according to some higher-level political and ideological perspective. And there is a cottage industry of observers who have given themselves the unenviable task of transmuting the president’s tics and utterances into something like a calculated strategy — an intellectually defensible set of doctrines rather than the thoughtless patter of an outer-borough confidence man.

But this has always strained credulity. To ask anyone, for instance, to treat the president’s display of childish pique opposite Zelensky in the Oval Office as some return to Teddy Rooseveltian great-power realism — as opposed to the embarrassing tantrum of a grade-school bully — is to demand that readers administer a self-lobotomy.

Likewise, it takes willful blindness to Trump’s own history of explicit racism to treat his crusade against diversity and integration as an embrace of meritocracy (please ignore the people he has chosen to lead the government) rather than a function of the same bigotries that drove him to attack Barack Obama as illegitimate and unfit to be president.

There is no evidence that Trump is a figure of deep thought or serious insight. There is no evidence that Trump is anything other than what he’s been for his entire time in the public eye: an ego-driven creature of boundless envy and vicious, overlapping resentments. Those resentments have led him on a grand tour of retribution against the public.

And his envy?

Well, if Trump wants anything, it is the untrammeled authority of the world’s autocrats. He wants to be a Putin or a Viktor Orban or a Kim Jong-un. He wants to rule with unchecked power. And if his psychology tells us anything, he will do everything he can to make that a reality, American democracy be damned.

Russ Tanner – Skywatch News / Symptoms

March 3 – The Daily Spraying Log

thedailysprayinglog – #chemtrailsitswhatyoubreathe

11:49 am

Please listen carefully.

ONLY military jets are releasing substances into the air that we can smell and taste and which cause serious, immediate health issues. Commercial jets may be releasing things because of jet fuel that has been intentionally altered to produce trails, but fallout from commercial jets does not have any odd odor or taste and DOES NOT induce health symptoms. ALSO, both military and commercial jets began producing trails at the same time historically—between 1995 an 2005—with very rare exceptions.

What are the implications of this observation (This is not a “theory”, it is a first-hand observation.)?

What would the public think if only military jets began producing trails while commercial jets did not? This would raise some serious public concern.

What the PTB did was to make both classes of jets produce trails at the same time historically, then “normalize” the trails by falsely claiming they have always been there; a blatant lie. The PTB had to make both classes of jets produce trails at the same time historically so keep the public from asking the question:

“Why does this military DC-9 tanker produce a trail while this commercial DC-9 not produce a trail?”

Clearly, there had to be a plan in place to “normalize” the trails in the mind of the public, and this normalization could not succeed if military jets made trails while the commercial counterpart did not.

As a lifelong skywatcher, I know first-hand that I have never, ever seen a trail come from a jet (except at air shows where it is done intentionally), either commercial or military before this fiasco began in 2005 in the area in which I lived. On top of all this, I smelled and tasted the fallout from these low-flying, military jets within 20 to 40 minutes of them producing trails over my house FROM DAY ONE. They made me, and many others, physically sick, and they still do to this day.

Now we have lab tests showing a myriad of poisonous metals including mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium, uranium, barium, strontium, aluminum (and more) in dust and rainwater.

These types common tests showing this same range and type of toxicity coincides with the appearance of “jet trails”.

Is this just a wild coincidence?

No. Everything has a cause, so the PTB are working overtime with every propaganda technique they have at their disposal to disassociate the massive poisoning of the people and the lands from the appearance of jet trails.

Being someone who clearly smells and tastes the plumes every single day, the connection is blatantly obvious, but don’t forget. It is ONLY the military jets (which do not have publicly-readable transponders) which produce the tastes, odors, and ill effects we are experiencing every single day.

The Spraying Log

We have been hit with 4 plumes so far this morning. All plumes were dominated by the inflammatory types. This has made the air nearly unbreathable for me, and very toxic.

Following are the event profiles for the day so far. Notice the common 2-hour intervals.

~ 7:45 am – Hit with multi-component plume.
Intensity Delta (rise-time): Medium-Fast

Peak Intensity: 9

~ 10:08 am – Hit with multi-component plume.
Intensity Delta (rise-time): Medium-Fast

Peak Intensity: 9.25

~ 12:02 pm – Hit with multi-component plume.
Intensity Delta (rise-time): Medium-Fast

Current Intensity: Above 10

Components (strongest to weakest):

  • Neo-Inflammatory – Inflames the heart, lungs, and head.
  • Inflammatory – Inflames the heart and lungs in some (dangerous).
  • Sedative/Magnesium-Blocker/Beta-Blocker – Cadmium? Blocks magnesium metabolism, may induce arrhythmia (dangerous).
  • Model Cement/Burnt Plastic – See Microplastics.
  • Mercury – Always present.
  • Copper – They tasted copped in the air after Chernobyl. Is this why blood-uranium levels are rising is some?

Components (strongest to weakest):

  • Neo-Inflammatory – Inflames the heart, lungs, and head.
  • Inflammatory – Inflames the heart and lungs in some (dangerous).
  • Sedative/Magnesium-Blocker/Beta-Blocker – Cadmium? Blocks magnesium metabolism, may induce arrhythmia (dangerous).
  • Model Cement/Burnt Plastic – See Microplastics.
  • Mercury – Always present.
  • Copper – They tasted copped in the air after Chernobyl. Is this why blood-uranium levels are rising is some?

~ 12:15 pm – Hit with a single-component plume
Intensity Delta: Fast
Current Intensity: 9.5, Steady
Component:

  • Burnt Electronics/Skunk

At intentional attack on all life continues.

“And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth”. —Revelation 11:18

Craig Childress PsyD – 2nd opinion Consultant -Child Psychological Abuse

I’m a second opinion consultant. That’s what old folks are best at.

We have experience. The young do, the old consult from our accumulated wisdom.

I have a very niche role. I have a client-parent-attorney. My role is to do what I can to ensure the child and family receives an accurate diagnosis and effective treatment plan, and that the Court receives an accurate diagnosis of the family problem for its decision-making surrounding the child.

If you value my opinion regarding the pathology in the family, then I am of value. If my opinion regarding the pathology present in the family is not valued, then I am of no value.

It all comes down to my credibility. Is what I’m saying true or false?

Look it over. Decide. You’ll find that everything I say about the pathology in the family courts is 100% supported, true, and correct.

I know that. I know that it all comes down to credibility. That’s why I’ve grounded in established knowledge, beginning with the DSM-5 diagnostic system of the American Psychological Association and the ethics code for the American Psychological Association.

Forensic psychologists, take a look at what Dr. Childress is asserting. Is it true of false? Judges and court-involved professionals, take a look at what Dr. Childress is asserting. Is it true or false?

Decide. I’ll wait. Dum-dee-dum… it’s true.

So can we now move forward into protecting children from child abuse, and their parents from spousal abuse?

I wrote an email confirming the information I discussed in a consultation session with a parent for documentation purposes to be shared around professionals.

You may find it’s content helpful as well. I always say the same thing – and I’ll continue to say the same thing until we start protecting children from child abuse by a narcissistic-borderline-dark personality parent.

_______________

Diagnosis: your family will need an accurate diagnosis of the problem so that an effective treatment plan can be developed. Currently, I am not confident that the pathology (problem) in the family has been accurately diagnosed.

Clinical Concerns (differential diagnosis): the clinical concerns surrounding the family problem include the following differential diagnostic possibilities:

• Child abuse by father (specify the type of abuse)

• A persecutory delusion with the mother induced in the child (DSM-5 297.1 Delusional Disorder; persecutory type)

• A false (factitious) attachment pathology imposed on the child by the mother’s distorted parenting (DSM-5 300.19 Factitious Disorder Imposed on the Child; FDIA)

• Child psychological abuse by the mother who is creating false attachment pathology in the child for secondary gain to the mother (DSM-5 V995.51 Child Psychological Abuse)

• Spousal psychological abuse of the father by the mother using the children as the spousal abuse weapon (DSM-5 V995.82 Spouse or Partner Abuse, Psychological).

I have attached the diagnostic questions that need to be answered. The current family therapist has duty of care and duty to protect obligations relative to the diagnostic concerns involved.

I have the following resources available for the treating therapist and GAL (and Court) regarding the diagnostic assessment of court-involved family conflict surrounding child custody:

• YouTube Diagnosis Series: DSM-5 Diagnoses of Family Court Pathology

• YouTube Diagnosis Series: Diagnosing a Persecutory Delusion

• YouTube Diagnosis Series: Diagnosing a Factitious Disorder Imposed on the Child

• YouTube Diagnosis Series: Diagnosing Child Abuse in the Family Courts

• YouTube Diagnosis Series: Assessing Parenting

I recommend that a proper risk assessment be conducted for the family to the appropriate differential diagnoses for each parent. The current therapist has duty of care and duty to protect obligations, and it would be incumbent upon this therapist to either conduct a proper risk assessment for the dangerous pathologies potentially involved in the family, or to ensure that a proper risk assessment gets conducted.

Dangerous Pathology & Risk Assessments

There are three dangerous pathologies, suicide, homicide and abuse (child, spousal, and elder abuse), Whenever a mental health professional encounters any dangerous pathology (suicide, homicide, abuse) duty to protect obligations are active and the mental health professional must do three things:

1) Risk Assessment: the mental health professional must personally conduct a proper risk assessment for the danger involved, or ensure that a proper risk assessment gets conducted,

2) Protective Action: the mental health professional must take an affirmative protective action to ensure everyone’s safety (this might be increasing the frequency of sessions for a suicidal patient, or a CPS referral for child abuse concerns).

3) Documentation: the mental health professional should then document the findings of the risk assessment (if one was conducted) and the affirmative protective action taken.

I indicated that I am available for professional consultation with all court-involved mental health and legal professionals.

I am attaching the domains of my expertise and vita. Court-involved professionals can also follow me on Bluesky: @drchildress.bsky.social

Craig Childress, Psy.D.

Clinical Psychologist

WA 61538481

OR 3942 – CA 18857

A local official reports on personnel cuts in SSA

A report from an employee of the Social Security Administration, who wishes to remain anonymous. We have not confirmed the details, but I suspect that this is likely accurate. I am passing it on because of its likeliness. The employee reports these 10 actions have quietly taken place during the past two weeks without any press coverage

  1. probationary attorney-level decision writers who are responsible for assisting Administrative Law Judges were terminated and at a time when the agency has massive backlogs in cases at the hearing level.
  2. The new acting commissioner gloated about firing 14 employees as an “accomplishment” in his commissioner broadcast to the agency
  3. The entire Office of Transformation, and its 60+ employees were dissolved. Their whole purpose was to promote agency-wide efficiencies and faster processing times through oversight over SSA systems and use of information technology.
  4. The entire Office of Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity and its 190 employees were dissolved, including the Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner of Civil Rights. OCREO conducts statutorily mandated requirements for employees and members of the public including the reasonable accommodation request process, the public facing discrimination complaint process, and the EEOC employment discrimination complaint process. The National RA Coordinator at OCREO whose position was court ordered was also terminated.
  5. component heads and executives were told to draft plans to slash administrative SSA staff by 50% and to reduce the total SSA workforce by seven to eight thousand
  6. SSA staff were sent an email threatening massive reorganization of SSA followed with significant workforce reduction. The email pressured seasoned employees, even front-line employees, with monetary incentives to resign or take early retirement and threatened to fire employees for cause should they not retire or resign.
  7. Executive staff responsible for overseeing regional field office operations were terminated, I know that one region had all but 3 out 72 staff members terminated and it is very likely that the other ten regions had similar terminations. These regional executive offices oversee hundreds of field offices.
  8. The Acting Commissioner sent out a memo to SSA staff indicating significant restructuring of the agency due a “bloated workforce and organization structure,” even though staffing at SSA has been the lowest it’s been in 50 years. The reorganization includes taking the 10 regions that SSA’s serves and consolidating into 4 regions; and combining multiple independent SSA components together in an effort to “downsize” or “streamline”. This could potentially lead to massive closures in field offices, a reduction of services, and a significant number of terminations of agency employees.
  9. Terminations are happening swiftly and often late in the day to avoid bringing attention to any media or congressional attention to them.
  10. The trauma they are creating for SSA staff is unreal. I am aware of at least three terminated SSA employees who have committed suicide, one of which I personally knew