“đ„Read this:đ„
đThereâs a cultural movement I want to address head-on: adult children choosing no contact with their parents.
đ€Many who make this decision insist it wasnât impulsive. Theyâve sat in therapy sessions, told their stories, catalogued their pain, and often wrestled with the choice for a long time. Therapists, hearing only their perspective, frequently agree: no contact may be the healthiest option.
đŻBut noticeâthese are sessions the parent is not invited to. The other half of the story is absent. The relationship itself is not in the room.
đ€Itâs like doing marriage therapy with one spouse missing: you can validate the pain, but you cannot repair the bond.
đ€And so silence is prescribed. The phone goes unanswered. Holidays pass unacknowledged. Letters are returned. Gifts unopened.
đđAnd what remains is not just the pain of the past, but a second wound layered on top: betrayal.
đWhen Silence Becomes Its Own Injury
đđI think of a mother I worked with (details changed). Her daughter went no contact for two years. During that time, the mother did everything her daughter had askedâtherapy, reflection, tangible change. She longed not for perfection, but for another chance.
đWhen her daughter finally reappeared, she expected relief. Instead, she was met with her motherâs trembling hands and a voice that shook: âI donât know if I can trust you not to leave me again.â
đThe daughter had assumed reconciliation could begin where things left off. But the mother was now carrying a new injury: betrayal trauma.
What We Learn from Couples Therapy
đŻWe see this dynamic clearly in couplesâ work. When infidelity is discovered, it is not just a âmarital problem.â It is a betrayal trauma. Research shows that the betrayed partner often develops symptoms severe enough to meet criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
đ€The healing process must follow an order of operations:
đ€Acknowledge and tend to the trauma first.
Only then can the relationshipâs deeper vulnerabilities be addressed.
Skip that order, and reconciliation fails. Why? Because betrayal doesnât just woundâit destabilizes trust at the foundation.
đ„Estrangement as Betrayalđ„
đEstrangement is not infidelity. Parentâchild bonds are not romantic. But betrayal is betrayal.
đđParents who are cut off donât just echo PTSD symptomsđâthey meet the criteria. Intrusive thoughts. Avoidance. Negative shifts in mood and belief. Hyperarousal. I see it again and again in my work: they replay unanswered voicemails, they withdraw from social connection, they lose interest in what once gave life meaning.
đAnd beyond the symptoms, there is the unthinkable reality: discovering that your own childâthe one you raised from birth,
đđthe one whose existence shaped your identityâis capable of abandoning you altogether. The person you love most is not dead, but gone by choice. Functionally absent, yet still alive.
đThat awareness shatters a parentâs belief system. It is not only the relationship that breaksâit is their entire way of understanding themselves and others. If my child could do this, what does that say about me? About love? About safety in the world?
đThis is why reconciliation, when it comes, does not begin with a blank slate. It begins with a parent carrying the wound of abandonment at the deepest level of attachment. And it is a wound very difficult to walk back from.
The Illusion of Benign Silence
đPart of why no contact has gained traction is because we want to believe itâs benign. We want to believe itâs passive, even surgicalâlike a scalpel excising a cancerous lesion. Clean. Precise. Necessary.
đBut in practice, itâs rarely that. More often, it lands like a blunt-force bludgeon. The adult child may feel empowered by the silence, but for the parent, itâs not quietâitâs shattering. Itâs not the steady hand of a surgeonâitâs the sudden swing of an axe.
And like any blunt-force injury, it leaves trauma in its wake.
đOne of the most damaging narratives I seeâpromoted both by therapists and by adult children themselvesâis that accountability rests entirely on the parentâs shoulders. The parent must do all the apologizing, all the repairing, all the changing. And until they do, the child bears no responsibility to engage in the relationship.
đBut once betrayal trauma has been created, that imbalance will never work. A relationship cannot heal when one side claims all the power and the other is asked to carry all the blame.
đAnd here is the harder truth: what does it say about a clinicianâor about any personâwho promotes this kind of one-way accountability? At best, it reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how relationships heal. At worst, it becomes an endorsement of relational cruelty dressed up as âboundaries.â
đTrue reconciliation requires mutuality. Both people must face the pain that has been created, name their own part, and participate in repair. Without that, what is being offered is not healing at all, but a permanent imbalance of power that ensures the relationship will remain fragile, or collapse altogether.
Where My Field Must Reckon
Here is where I want to challenge my own profession.
Too often, therapists collude with estrangement because we are only hearing one side of the story. We validate the pain of the adult child (as we should). But we stop there. We do not invite the parent into the room.
And when we donât, we risk mistaking rupture for healing. We allow no contact to masquerade as a healthy boundary, when in truth it is a relational detonation.
âïžI am not saying adult children must remain in abusive relationships. But I am saying we need more imagination than silence. We need to help them articulate boundaries, confront painful truths, and insist on changeâwith the parent in the room, not banished from it.
âïžA Harder, More Honest Path
đđNo contact feels decisive. It feels like relief. But it almost always makes reconciliation harder. Healing the original wound is difficult enough. Adding betrayal trauma on top makes repair exponentially more complex.
đFamilies can heal. I have seen it. But only when both sides acknowledge not just the past, but the pain of the cutoff itself.
The Truth We Must Say Out Loud
đNo contact isnât neutral.
It isnât clean.
It isnât without consequence.
đWe like to imagine itâs a scalpelâprecise, measured, cutting away only what is diseased. But more often, it strikes like a blunt-force bludgeon. It doesnât just remove what was harmful. It crushes what was vital too: trust, belonging, the very possibility of safety in connection.
đŒAnd if reconciliation is ever to occur, the first step will always be this: acknowledging that the silence itself inflicted a wound.
Until that truth is spoken, healing cannot begin.
đFinally, here is the deeper understanding. Up until he was forced to choose between his wife’s family and his own, we had an unusually respectful, caring relationship, with much support and compassion. So now, after eleven years of no contact, now that the the grandchildren have forgotten who we are, and we have wondered if we wasted our lives, we agree we dont want them back. Trust has been blown to pieces. We have nothing left for them.
đWeâve Been SubvertedâAnd Itâs Showing Up in Our Families
How demoralization, destabilization, crisis, and normalization are reshaping our understanding of kinshipâand why we need to talk about it.
đŒThis isn’t a Diagnosis.
Why âemotionally immature parentâ belongs in the dustbin of pop psychologyâalongside foam bats and primal screams.
How Do You Grieve Someone Whoâs Still Alive?
Ambiguous loss is the cruel paradox of estrangementâlearning to hold love and grief for someone who is both here and gone.
Written by RACHEL HAACK”
